Gentoo Archives: gentoo-commits

From: "Ulrich Mueller (ulm)" <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-commits@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-commits] gentoo commit in xml/htdocs/proj/en/council/meeting-logs: 20130924-summary.txt
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:49:08
Message-Id: 20130927184900.3465E2004C@flycatcher.gentoo.org
1 ulm 13/09/27 18:49:00
2
3 Added: 20130924-summary.txt
4 Log:
5 Summary for 20130924 meeting.
6
7 Revision Changes Path
8 1.1 xml/htdocs/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20130924-summary.txt
9
10 file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20130924-summary.txt?rev=1.1&view=markup
11 plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20130924-summary.txt?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
12
13 Index: 20130924-summary.txt
14 ===================================================================
15 Summary of Gentoo council meeting 24 September 2013
16
17 Agenda
18 ======
19 1. Introduction and roll call
20 2. Drop support for separate /usr partition [1] - williamh
21 3. Open bugs with council involvement
22
23
24 Roll call
25 =========
26 Present:
27 blueness
28 dberkholz
29 creffett (proxy for dilfridge)
30 rich0
31 scarabeus
32 ulm
33 williamh
34
35 Drop support for separate /usr partition
36 ========================================
37 Following the decision in the 20130813 meeting, williamh asked the
38 council to agree that the preparations for early boot mechanisms are
39 complete and that the necessary documentation is in place. In the
40 following discussion it was noted that documentation for NFS mounted
41 /usr was still missing (bug 481660). According to williamh, this
42 should just work, without any need for separate documentation. Some
43 council members expressed their concern that separate /usr support
44 shouldn't be removed proactively. The overall opinion on this was that
45 the base-system team should be trusted to do the right thing. It was
46 agreed that a news item should be sent, followed by a reasonable
47 transition time for users.
48
49 Vote:
50 - "The Council agrees that all preparations for dropping support for
51 separate /usr without an initramfs or similar boot mechanism are
52 complete. A news item will be prepared, and users will be given one
53 month to switch after the news item has been sent."
54 Accepted with 5 yes votes, 1 no vote, 1 abstention.
55
56 Action:
57 - Prepare the news item (williamh).
58
59 Open bugs with council involvement
60 ==================================
61 - Bug 481202 "Tracker - Documentation or implementation issues for
62 dropping of separate /usr support" [2]
63 No action, but leave the bug open as a tracker.
64
65 - Bug 477030 "Missing summary for 20130611 council meeting" [3]
66 No progress since last meeting.
67
68 - Bug 457000 "Missing log and summary for previous council
69 meetings" [4]
70 Action: Add log and summary for the 20080515 meeting (ulm).
71
72 - Bug 480408 "Add /releases/${arch}/verified tree for tested
73 autobuilds" [5]
74 Already discussed in August meeting, council can be removed from CC.
75
76 - Bug 485448 "Migrate council project page to the wiki" [6]
77 Migration to the wiki was welcomed by council members. It was noted
78 by dberkholz that the wiki in general could profit from a better
79 skin. Also the list of meeting logs should be folded by default, or
80 moved to a subpage.
81 Action: Complete the migration, redirect old project pages (ulm).
82
83 Next meeting date
84 =================
85 8 October 2013, 19:00 UTC
86
87
88 [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/2946
89 [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481202
90 [3] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477030
91 [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457000
92 [5] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480408
93 [6] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485448