[gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-java/tijmp/files: tijmp-jni.h.patch

[Vlastimil Babka (caster)]

caster      10/04/05 12:09:08

  Added:                tijmp-jni.h.patch
  Log:
  New package based on dev-java/jmp but for the new JDK 1.6 API. Bug #233548.
  (Portage version: 2.2_rc67/cvs/Linux x86_64)

Revision  Changes    Path
1.1                  dev-java/tijmp/files/tijmp-jni.h.patch

file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-java/tijmp/files/tijmp-jni.h.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup
plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-java/tijmp/files/tijmp-jni.h.patch?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain

Index: tijmp-jni.h.patch
===================================================================
# Patch by Vlastimil Babka <caster@g.o>
# Some JDK's such as ibm-jdk-bin don't have jni_md.h, so make the test more robust
--- configure.ac.orig	2009-01-10 00:29:01.000000000 +0100
+++ configure.ac	2010-04-05 12:17:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -24,22 +24,16 @@
   JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/jdk
 fi
 
-jni_md=no
-AC_CHECK_HEADERS($JAVA_HOME/include/$java_os/jni_md.h,
-	jni_md=found)
+dnl ok, maybe we dont always need include/$java_os but we use an -I for it anyway...
+CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I$JAVA_HOME/include -I$JAVA_HOME/include/$java_os"
 
-if test $jni_md = no
-then 
-AC_CHECK_HEADERS($JAVA_HOME/include/jni_md.h,
-	jni_md=found)
-fi
+jni_h=no
+AC_CHECK_HEADERS($JAVA_HOME/include/jni.h,
+	jni_h=found)
 
-if test $jni_md = no
+if test $jni_h = no
 then
-  	AC_MSG_ERROR(Does JAVA_HOME point to the java SDK directory?)
-else
-dnl ok, maybe we dont need include/$java_os but we use an -I for it anyway...
-  	CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I$JAVA_HOME/include -I$JAVA_HOME/include/$java_os"
+  	AC_MSG_ERROR(Could not find jni.h. Does JAVA_HOME point to the java SDK directory?)
 fi
 
 AC_CHECK_HEADER($JAVA_HOME/include/jvmti.h,