1 |
commit: 4b4f4514202b682d5361da627e6c317f8acc9907 |
2 |
Author: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
3 |
AuthorDate: Thu Apr 18 23:59:29 2019 +0000 |
4 |
Commit: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
5 |
CommitDate: Fri Apr 19 00:01:25 2019 +0000 |
6 |
URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4b4f4514 |
7 |
|
8 |
Revert "sys-libs/glibc: Fix headers-only cross-build for riscv" |
9 |
|
10 |
Sergei's solution is way better. Tomorrow. |
11 |
This reverts commit 08ac6a89ea72d4cdcb02383410b58e76e69913a4. |
12 |
|
13 |
Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge <AT> gentoo.org> |
14 |
|
15 |
sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.29-r2.ebuild | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------ |
16 |
sys-libs/glibc/glibc-9999.ebuild | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------ |
17 |
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) |
18 |
|
19 |
diff --git a/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.29-r2.ebuild b/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.29-r2.ebuild |
20 |
index fe9feab7f75..093ffc207eb 100644 |
21 |
--- a/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.29-r2.ebuild |
22 |
+++ b/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.29-r2.ebuild |
23 |
@@ -1006,6 +1006,25 @@ glibc_headers_configure() { |
24 |
popd >/dev/null |
25 |
fi |
26 |
|
27 |
+ case ${CTARGET} in |
28 |
+ riscv*) |
29 |
+ # RISC-V interrogates the compiler to determine which target to |
30 |
+ # build. If building the headers then we don't strictly need a |
31 |
+ # RISC-V compiler, so the built-in definitions that are provided |
32 |
+ # along with all RISC-V compiler might not exist. This causes |
33 |
+ # glibc's RISC-V preconfigure script to blow up. Since we're just |
34 |
+ # building the headers any value will actually work here, so just |
35 |
+ # pick the standard one (rv64g/lp64d) to make the build scripts |
36 |
+ # happy for now -- the headers are all the same anyway so it |
37 |
+ # doesn't matter. |
38 |
+ headers_only_arch_CPPFLAGS+=( |
39 |
+ -D__riscv_xlen=64 |
40 |
+ -D__riscv_flen=64 |
41 |
+ -D__riscv_float_abi_double=1 |
42 |
+ -D__riscv_atomic=1 |
43 |
+ ) ;; |
44 |
+ esac |
45 |
+ |
46 |
local myconf=() |
47 |
myconf+=( |
48 |
--disable-sanity-checks |
49 |
@@ -1023,24 +1042,6 @@ glibc_headers_configure() { |
50 |
# Nothing is compiled here which would affect the headers for the target. |
51 |
# So forcing CC/CFLAGS is sane. |
52 |
local headers_only_CC=$(tc-getBUILD_CC) |
53 |
- |
54 |
- case ${CTARGET} in |
55 |
- riscv*) |
56 |
- # RISC-V interrogates the compiler to determine which target to |
57 |
- # build. If building the headers then we don't strictly need a |
58 |
- # RISC-V compiler, so the built-in definitions that are provided |
59 |
- # along with all RISC-V compiler might not exist. This causes |
60 |
- # glibc's RISC-V preconfigure script to blow up. Since we're just |
61 |
- # building the headers any value will actually work here, so just |
62 |
- # pick the standard one (rv64g/lp64d) to make the build scripts |
63 |
- # happy for now -- the headers are all the same anyway so it |
64 |
- # doesn't matter. |
65 |
- # It's not sufficient to shove the flags into CPPFLAGS, they need |
66 |
- # to really go *everywhere*. |
67 |
- headers_only_CC="${headers_only_CC} -D__riscv_xlen=64 -D__riscv_flen=64 -D__riscv_float_abi_double=1 -D__riscv_atomic=1" |
68 |
- ;; |
69 |
- esac |
70 |
- |
71 |
local headers_only_CFLAGS="-O1 -pipe" |
72 |
local headers_only_CPPFLAGS="-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE ${headers_only_arch_CPPFLAGS[*]}" |
73 |
local headers_only_LDFLAGS="" |
74 |
|
75 |
diff --git a/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-9999.ebuild b/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-9999.ebuild |
76 |
index 20846e05faf..142153734f9 100644 |
77 |
--- a/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-9999.ebuild |
78 |
+++ b/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-9999.ebuild |
79 |
@@ -1007,6 +1007,25 @@ glibc_headers_configure() { |
80 |
popd >/dev/null |
81 |
fi |
82 |
|
83 |
+ case ${CTARGET} in |
84 |
+ riscv*) |
85 |
+ # RISC-V interrogates the compiler to determine which target to |
86 |
+ # build. If building the headers then we don't strictly need a |
87 |
+ # RISC-V compiler, so the built-in definitions that are provided |
88 |
+ # along with all RISC-V compiler might not exist. This causes |
89 |
+ # glibc's RISC-V preconfigure script to blow up. Since we're just |
90 |
+ # building the headers any value will actually work here, so just |
91 |
+ # pick the standard one (rv64g/lp64d) to make the build scripts |
92 |
+ # happy for now -- the headers are all the same anyway so it |
93 |
+ # doesn't matter. |
94 |
+ headers_only_arch_CPPFLAGS+=( |
95 |
+ -D__riscv_xlen=64 |
96 |
+ -D__riscv_flen=64 |
97 |
+ -D__riscv_float_abi_double=1 |
98 |
+ -D__riscv_atomic=1 |
99 |
+ ) ;; |
100 |
+ esac |
101 |
+ |
102 |
local myconf=() |
103 |
myconf+=( |
104 |
--disable-sanity-checks |
105 |
@@ -1024,24 +1043,6 @@ glibc_headers_configure() { |
106 |
# Nothing is compiled here which would affect the headers for the target. |
107 |
# So forcing CC/CFLAGS is sane. |
108 |
local headers_only_CC=$(tc-getBUILD_CC) |
109 |
- |
110 |
- case ${CTARGET} in |
111 |
- riscv*) |
112 |
- # RISC-V interrogates the compiler to determine which target to |
113 |
- # build. If building the headers then we don't strictly need a |
114 |
- # RISC-V compiler, so the built-in definitions that are provided |
115 |
- # along with all RISC-V compiler might not exist. This causes |
116 |
- # glibc's RISC-V preconfigure script to blow up. Since we're just |
117 |
- # building the headers any value will actually work here, so just |
118 |
- # pick the standard one (rv64g/lp64d) to make the build scripts |
119 |
- # happy for now -- the headers are all the same anyway so it |
120 |
- # doesn't matter. |
121 |
- # It's not sufficient to shove the flags into CPPFLAGS, they need |
122 |
- # to really go *everywhere*. |
123 |
- headers_only_CC="${headers_only_CC} -D__riscv_xlen=64 -D__riscv_flen=64 -D__riscv_float_abi_double=1 -D__riscv_atomic=1" |
124 |
- ;; |
125 |
- esac |
126 |
- |
127 |
local headers_only_CFLAGS="-O1 -pipe" |
128 |
local headers_only_CPPFLAGS="-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE ${headers_only_arch_CPPFLAGS[*]}" |
129 |
local headers_only_LDFLAGS="" |