1 |
jmbsvicetto 09/04/19 23:16:12 |
2 |
|
3 |
Added: kde-project-meeting-log-20090401.txt |
4 |
Log: |
5 |
Added log for the 20090401 meeting and updated index.xml to include the link to the log and summary (to follow). |
6 |
|
7 |
Revision Changes Path |
8 |
1.1 xml/htdocs/proj/en/desktop/kde/meeting-logs/kde-project-meeting-log-20090401.txt |
9 |
|
10 |
file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/desktop/kde/meeting-logs/kde-project-meeting-log-20090401.txt?rev=1.1&view=markup |
11 |
plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/desktop/kde/meeting-logs/kde-project-meeting-log-20090401.txt?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain |
12 |
|
13 |
Index: kde-project-meeting-log-20090401.txt |
14 |
=================================================================== |
15 |
21:01 <@scarabeus> hey |
16 |
21:01 <@scarabeus> now we can start |
17 |
21:01 <@jmbsvicetto> I'm out of here. See you later :P |
18 |
21:02 <@alexxy> jmbsvicetto: stay here =) |
19 |
21:02 <@scarabeus> hehe |
20 |
21:02 <@scarabeus> !herd kde |
21 |
21:02 < Willikins> (kde) alexxy, caleb, carlo, cryos, deathwing00, genstef, jmbsvicetto, keytoaster, mattepiu, patrick, scarabeus, tampakrap, tgurr |
22 |
21:02 <@scarabeus> krytzz: reavertm Sput wired |
23 |
21:02 <@scarabeus> ausing again |
24 |
21:02 <@scarabeus> meeting time |
25 |
21:03 <+krytzz> aye |
26 |
21:03 * tampakrap is here |
27 |
21:03 <@cryos|work> That was an hour ago wasn't it? I thought we were done :P |
28 |
21:03 * jmbsvicetto agrees |
29 |
21:03 <@scarabeus> :D |
30 |
21:03 * alexxy here or there like a psi^2 |
31 |
21:04 <@scarabeus> bonsaikitten: dont hide, i saw ya |
32 |
21:04 -!- jmbsvicetto changed the topic of #gentoo-kde to: Official Gentoo KDE Project channel | Next Meeting^Wamarok party: Wednesday April 1st 19:00 UTC | KDE 4 guide: http://tinyurl.com/4n47v4 | Overlays: kde-testing, qting-edge | Want to help us? Ask channel staff for info | Bugs: http://tinyurl.com/kdebugs1 http://xrl.us/qtbugs | Useful links: http://userbase.kde.org/ http://ktown.kde.org/~dirk/dashboard | Want to test KDE4 on a kvm? http://tinyurl.com/by7tv3 |
33 |
21:04 <@scarabeus> !herd qt |
34 |
21:04 < Willikins> scarabeus: (qt) caleb, carlo, hwoarang, yngwin |
35 |
21:04 * jmbsvicetto starts jumping around |
36 |
21:04 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: ok, ok. I'll behave ;) |
37 |
21:04 <@hwoarang> im here |
38 |
21:04 * hwoarang GOGO GREEEEEEEEEEEEEECE |
39 |
21:04 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: well you are the lead, you do the example for us :D |
40 |
21:05 <@scarabeus> remember we store meeting logs tho :D |
41 |
21:05 <@tampakrap> i think we shouldn't this time |
42 |
21:05 <@scarabeus> hehe |
43 |
21:05 <+reavertm> ok... |
44 |
21:05 <@scarabeus> reavertm: you are first on list |
45 |
21:05 <@scarabeus> so speak up |
46 |
21:06 <@scarabeus> :D |
47 |
21:06 <+reavertm> so, kdeprefix |
48 |
21:06 <@scarabeus> http://www.pastebin.cz:80/16911 |
49 |
21:06 <+reavertm> the idea is ... to drop it :) |
50 |
21:06 <@scarabeus> (list for others) |
51 |
21:06 * wired back |
52 |
21:06 <@alexxy> or mask kdeprefix useflag |
53 |
21:06 <@alexxy> =) |
54 |
21:06 <+reavertm> (from non kde-base) |
55 |
21:06 <@tampakrap> i agree |
56 |
21:07 <+reavertm> I already started to play in dropped-kdeprefix-on-non-kde-base branch if anyone is interested |
57 |
21:07 <@alexxy> may be better to mask it for all packages |
58 |
21:07 <+reavertm> in the process I rewritten kde4 eclass |
59 |
21:07 <@alexxy> so people who realy want could unmask it |
60 |
21:07 -!- spitfire_ [n=quassel@××××××××××××××××××××××××××.pl] has joined #gentoo-kde |
61 |
21:07 <+reavertm> important changes are: |
62 |
21:07 <@scarabeus> alexxy: nah i prefer nonkdeprefix, it is better |
63 |
21:08 <@scarabeus> alexxy: less thins to worry about |
64 |
21:08 <+reavertm> NEED_KDE deprecated in favor of KDE_REQUIRED and KDE_MINIMAL (the latter already there) |
65 |
21:08 <+wired> scarabeus++ |
66 |
21:08 <@alexxy> scarabeus: i use -kdeprefix too |
67 |
21:08 <@alexxy> so we can mask kdeprefix use flag for tree packages |
68 |
21:08 <@tampakrap> if we mask it, we somehow still provide support for it, something that i don't want |
69 |
21:08 <@cryos|work> I use -kdeprefix too, but I think it would be nice to keep it as an option that can be unmasked. It has its uses, I just don't think it is for general consumption... |
70 |
21:08 <@alexxy> so people who want install 4.2 4.3 and live together can unmask it |
71 |
21:09 <+reavertm> my eclass drops kdeprefix from non-kde-base |
72 |
21:09 <@scarabeus> alexxy: the part for non-kde-base |
73 |
21:09 <@scarabeus> not for base kde |
74 |
21:09 <@scarabeus> :D |
75 |
21:09 <+reavertm> do you even read me? |
76 |
21:09 <@scarabeus> we are not removing the flags from kdebase/* |
77 |
21:09 <@scarabeus> :D |
78 |
21:09 <@cryos|work> Is there a way to hack it back in for non-kde-base if you don't care about support? |
79 |
21:09 <@tampakrap> everybody stop typing until reavertm finishes his words please |
80 |
21:09 <@scarabeus> cryos|work: narp |
81 |
21:10 <@scarabeus> for the eclass i already read it and i think it is much cleaner, specialy no "get_latest_kdedir" |
82 |
21:10 <@cryos|work> I work on several packages where I would like trunk and release. I could locally hack it, but the current situation is useful even if not supporte.d |
83 |
21:10 <+reavertm> RPATH solves possible linking issues |
84 |
21:10 <@scarabeus> well we droped mostly live slot for packages |
85 |
21:10 <@scarabeus> cryos|work: buty you can allways override prefix so it shoudl be no prob |
86 |
21:11 <+reavertm> now packages are built not agains newest available KDE (if more installed) but with the oldest - yet respecting KDE_MINIMIAL |
87 |
21:11 <@cryos|work> Seems a shame, but I can maintain custom ebuilds for the few I work on. |
88 |
21:11 <+reavertm> scarabeus: all live slots dropped |
89 |
21:12 <@jmbsvicetto> hmm, scarabeus / reavertm drop kdeprefix for non-live, right? |
90 |
21:12 <@scarabeus> for everything |
91 |
21:12 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus / reavertm: !kde-base live apps should install under /usr/kde/live |
92 |
21:13 * cryos|work thought that too... |
93 |
21:13 <+reavertm> /usr/kde/live is KDE release dir and should not contain any 3rd party apps imho |
94 |
21:13 <@scarabeus> that wont run for pple that install live misc apps for 4.2 in example |
95 |
21:13 <@alexxy> jmbsvicetto: no =) |
96 |
21:13 <@jmbsvicetto> We've been talking about this for a long time. all live ebuilds should go under /usr/kde/live |
97 |
21:13 <@scarabeus> i use lots of live apps |
98 |
21:13 <+reavertm> how aboyut accessing those live packages from kde 4.2 ? |
99 |
21:13 * alexxy also use kile amarok and k3b |
100 |
21:13 <@alexxy> with 4.2 and 4.3 snapshots |
101 |
21:14 <@alexxy> so i dont like idea of dropping kdeprefix for misk apps |
102 |
21:14 <@jmbsvicetto> If we use the KDE_MINIMAL it should work, no? |
103 |
21:14 <@cryos|work> So you are dropping any support for installing/building live apps against live KDE builds? |
104 |
21:14 <@alexxy> in way as jmbsvicetto said |
105 |
21:14 -!- [DWSR] is now known as DWSR |
106 |
21:14 <+reavertm> how is dropping kdeprefix from live packages related to not being able to use them with 4.2 ? |
107 |
21:14 <@scarabeus> cryos|work: so you think live should be special case... |
108 |
21:15 <@scarabeus> reavertm: well it can be done so live is special enviroment |
109 |
21:15 <@alexxy> i think better to mask kdeprefix use flag for all kde in tree |
110 |
21:15 <@scarabeus> and we can just not bother for it |
111 |
21:15 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: That's why live doesn't fit in SLOTS ;) |
112 |
21:15 <@cryos|work> scarabeus: I always have, but I tend to work with live and do development, but want a stable desktop for work... |
113 |
21:15 <@alexxy> so people who want eg 4.2 and live togther can deal with it |
114 |
21:16 <@scarabeus> alexxy: current approach is broken |
115 |
21:16 <+reavertm> I use 4.2 and live non-kde-base stuff |
116 |
21:16 <@scarabeus> i srsly fear next major release |
117 |
21:16 <@jmbsvicetto> ok, let's try something different |
118 |
21:16 <@jmbsvicetto> The point of having kdeprefix was to allow running more than 1 version at the same time |
119 |
21:16 <@cryos|work> I guess for people with live KDE, and live misc apps built against 4.2 things would likely still work though. |
120 |
21:16 <@scarabeus> eys that is maintained |
121 |
21:16 <+reavertm> jmbsvicetto: be more precise |
122 |
21:16 <+reavertm> more than one version of what? |
123 |
21:17 <+reavertm> KDE release or any package? |
124 |
21:17 <@jmbsvicetto> With the exception of live (imo) which should be under /usr/kde/live - the real solution for that is to change the kde build system and have all versions under /usr |
125 |
21:17 <@cryos|work> KDE, but are you really trying to separate packages that build against it? |
126 |
21:17 <@scarabeus> well it is like kde3 |
127 |
21:17 <@scarabeus> cryos|work: |
128 |
21:17 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: more than one KDE release |
129 |
21:17 -!- non7top [n=non7top@94.77.134.21] has joined #gentoo-kde |
130 |
21:17 <+reavertm> and you'll still have it :P |
131 |
21:18 <@cryos|work> OK - I will stay quiet. I am really busy today anyway and have not been on IRC for weeks.... |
132 |
21:18 < spitfire_> cryos|work: no it doesn't always work. I had quassel built against 4.2 and it didn;t run in live complaining about missing symbols in oxygen.so. |
133 |
21:18 <@jmbsvicetto> The point is whether anyone is willing to start the work |
134 |
21:18 <@jmbsvicetto> I haven't looked at that yet |
135 |
21:18 <+reavertm> spitfire_: |
136 |
21:18 <+reavertm> nop |
137 |
21:18 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work: I would like to get your opinion about this issue |
138 |
21:18 <+reavertm> you had quassel built againd live that didn;'t work with 4.2 |
139 |
21:19 <+reavertm> because so far it was like this - having 4.2 and -9999 - apps were bult againt *the newest* kde |
140 |
21:19 <@cryos|work> At least now KDE will work if built against an old KDE and linked to a newer one. |
141 |
21:19 <@scarabeus> yes |
142 |
21:19 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work: We've talked a lot about this and tried to reach a compromise that would satisfy everyone, so I would like that any change gets our support |
143 |
21:19 <@cryos|work> So building against 4.2 and linking to live should work, assuming no one screwed up and I do that a lot. |
144 |
21:19 <@scarabeus> yes it have to wor |
145 |
21:19 <@scarabeus> the cant break abi |
146 |
21:19 < spitfire_> reavertm: sry to interrupt but for example quassel never finds kde-live, always builds against 4.2 |
147 |
21:19 <+reavertm> actually there's RPATH |
148 |
21:20 <+reavertm> if we drop RPATH then we may start worrying about linkage problems |
149 |
21:20 <@cryos|work> It doesn't have to - people screw up... And there is RPATH which can force linking to a particular path. |
150 |
21:20 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: that's the "theory", but that's not their practice |
151 |
21:20 <@alexxy> spitfire_: later |
152 |
21:20 <@scarabeus> indeed |
153 |
21:20 <@cryos|work> jmbsvicetto: They do pretty well on the whole, but RPATH alleviates issues with screw ups too... |
154 |
21:20 <+reavertm> (and I'm going to drop rpath for -kdeprefix) |
155 |
21:20 <+reavertm> (btw) |
156 |
21:20 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work: all the mess with libplasma, phonon, kdeartwork-kscreensaver, ... |
157 |
21:21 <+reavertm> phonon is kdeprefix problem |
158 |
21:21 <@cryos|work> Like I said, they do pretty well... ABI is really tough to keep stable... |
159 |
21:21 <+reavertm> it install kde4 plugins |
160 |
21:22 <+reavertm> adding QT_PLUGIN_PATH to /usr/lib64/kde4/plugins could possibly solve it |
161 |
21:22 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work: The problem is that 4.0 was nowhere where they wanted it to be, so they've realized many things required changes |
162 |
21:22 <@cryos|work> Yeah, I know... Mixing versions is always really tough to get right too. |
163 |
21:22 <+reavertm> 4.3 is meant to be ABI compliany with 4.2 |
164 |
21:23 <@scarabeus> ok how about removing prefix totaly |
165 |
21:23 <@scarabeus> and have live/stable |
166 |
21:23 * jmbsvicetto looks at bonsaikitten |
167 |
21:23 <@scarabeus> so live apps are their own env |
168 |
21:23 <@scarabeus> and the stable is /usr |
169 |
21:23 * reavertm doesn't get it |
170 |
21:23 <+reavertm> where does live go? |
171 |
21:23 <@scarabeus> on the live note we can generate snapshots (weekly) |
172 |
21:23 <@scarabeus> /usr/kde/live/ |
173 |
21:24 <@scarabeus> everything live |
174 |
21:24 <@bonsaikitten> jmbsvicetto: what! |
175 |
21:24 <+reavertm> how is this different from current situation? |
176 |
21:24 <@scarabeus> i still prefer your solution |
177 |
21:24 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: To be honest, I'm losing the "motivation" to keep hammering about kdeprefix, but that was the major issue I had to deal with when we started working back in KDE |
178 |
21:24 <@scarabeus> reavertm: that there wont be kdeprefix anywhrere else than in live |
179 |
21:24 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: That's why I've resisted so long to dropping it |
180 |
21:24 -!- ali_bush [n=alistair@gentoo/developer/alibush] has quit [Remote closed the connection] |
181 |
21:24 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: well reavers approach is working with +kdeprefix and keeping good usability |
182 |
21:24 <@jmbsvicetto> bonsaikitten: Do you still care about kdeprefix or not? |
183 |
21:25 <@scarabeus> trust me it is 500% better than current solution of mine |
184 |
21:25 * cryos|work has also grown tired of the back and forth... Just want a reasonably stable env for users, and a solution for developers.... |
185 |
21:25 <@alexxy> kdeprefix can be masked |
186 |
21:25 <@jmbsvicetto> bonsaikitten: As I recall, you also felt it was important to have it and to allow users to mix versions |
187 |
21:25 <+reavertm> well, it's not working yet :P |
188 |
21:25 <@bonsaikitten> jmbsvicetto: my opinion hasn't changed since it was introduced |
189 |
21:25 <@alexxy> so users who sant it will unmask it |
190 |
21:25 <+reavertm> (plugins are not loaded properly - amarok issue) |
191 |
21:25 <@alexxy> but its good fature to have more then one kde release installed |
192 |
21:26 <@scarabeus> i would say lets see how it work and we can roll it out with 4.2.3 |
193 |
21:26 <+reavertm> what's all with this masking kdeprefix? |
194 |
21:26 <+reavertm> you can use.force it if you like :P |
195 |
21:26 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work / bonsaikitten: So, what do you say about this? |
196 |
21:26 <@scarabeus> i am for reavers solution |
197 |
21:27 <@cryos|work> Honestly, I am no longer certain what is being proposed. I feel like we really need to pick a solution and try to stick with it. The Apache team went back and forth over a few years and drove many users away... |
198 |
21:27 <@alexxy> reavertm's solutions better for misk packages |
199 |
21:27 <+reavertm> my idea (if it works) is to be possible to have kdeprefixed releases and the rest in /usr (accessible from any kde installed) |
200 |
21:27 <@jmbsvicetto> I guess I'll swallow kdeprefix at this time and will try to force me to look at the build system to allow the multiple versions / better split of packages |
201 |
21:27 <@bonsaikitten> jmbsvicetto: I haven't followed the discussion enough to have useful input |
202 |
21:28 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work / bonsaikitten: Then if you don't oppose, I say we try reavertm's approach |
203 |
21:28 <@scarabeus> bonsaikitten: kdeprefix for kde-base, misc apps into /usr including live misc apps |
204 |
21:28 <@bonsaikitten> sounds acceptable |
205 |
21:28 <@bonsaikitten> as I haven't contributed anything relevant in a while I don't see why I should be the decider |
206 |
21:28 <@scarabeus> ok majority already agreed |
207 |
21:28 <+reavertm> well, there's nothing spectaculat to try now, if it works then we'll see - i need to handle this plugins paths 1st |
208 |
21:29 <@cryos|work> I can live with it, I would rather be able to put misc live apps in /usr/kde/live too, but can likely hack the ebuilds I care about... |
209 |
21:29 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work / bonsaikitten: If in the end we realize we lost some flexibility, that will only serve to foster the need to look for the real solution (imho) - fixing the build system |
210 |
21:29 <@bonsaikitten> jmbsvicetto: acceptable :) |
211 |
21:29 <@scarabeus> bonsaikitten: could you fix at least 258027 |
212 |
21:29 <+reavertm> actually there's not a problem with restoring kdeprefix for misc apps, but |
213 |
21:29 <@cryos|work> So you are going to try and mix multiple versions in /usr? |
214 |
21:29 <+reavertm> live kde-misc would nee to have separate prefix :P |
215 |
21:30 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work: I think that's the "final" solution |
216 |
21:30 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work: I don't have any particular skill or knowledge to get it done, though |
217 |
21:30 <@cryos|work> That sounds amazingly tough to pull off. |
218 |
21:30 <@cryos|work> Not this solution though? |
219 |
21:30 <+reavertm> ok, cryos|work what's your proposition? |
220 |
21:30 <@bonsaikitten> scarabeus: oh ... let's see |
221 |
21:31 <+krytzz> hm... would that allow to mix 4.2 kdelibs and live kde-misc stuff for example? |
222 |
21:31 <+reavertm> maybe it apperas easier to handle than kde-misc in /usr |
223 |
21:31 <@cryos|work> I don't have one, more trying to understand what this proposal is planning on changing. |
224 |
21:31 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work: That solution isn't "compromised" for the current proposal |
225 |
21:31 <@scarabeus> the current pospal is easing major bumps, lets stick with it for 4.3 and then we can think about updating the build system |
226 |
21:31 * cryos|work was just trying to figure out if he understood what *this proposal* encompassed. |
227 |
21:32 <+reavertm> ok, let me summarize |
228 |
21:32 <+reavertm> the problem with kdeprefix for kde-misc apps is as follows : |
229 |
21:33 <+reavertm> let's say we have taglib-extras |
230 |
21:33 <+reavertm> it has optional kde integration |
231 |
21:34 <@cryos|work> So you are concerned with corner cases? |
232 |
21:34 <+reavertm> still it's just typical lib and should be accessed globally - it would be nice for it to not be kde-prefixed |
233 |
21:34 <+reavertm> or any other app - like amarok - I want it installed and used from any KDE4 i have (and I have 4.2, 4.3, live) |
234 |
21:34 <@cryos|work> I totally agree. I was the one who wanted to throw everything in /usr apart from development builds where people got to pick up the pieces themselves... |
235 |
21:35 <@cryos|work> If I develop on amarok I can write a custom ebuild if I want it in my /usr/kde/live as any dev can, so the impact is not terrible. |
236 |
21:35 <@cryos|work> I was more trying to confirm the scope of the changes proposed. |
237 |
21:36 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: The only issue I see and the reason for the kdeprefix is if you have k3b-1.* working and want to follow k3b-2.* (which I think is still broken), you're not willing to have to choose between one or the other |
238 |
21:36 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: But as stated, I'm going to drop my "resistance" |
239 |
21:36 <+reavertm> k3b-1 will be installed in kde3 prefix so i am told |
240 |
21:36 <+reavertm> (tampakrap?) |
241 |
21:36 <@cryos|work> That was my concern, but those users could be out of luck... |
242 |
21:36 <@cryos|work> At some stage having too much choice can spread us too thin. |
243 |
21:37 <@cryos|work> Many distros are just dropping KDE 3 entirely already. |
244 |
21:37 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work: yeah. The problem is that some users have been mailing us asking us not to do it |
245 |
21:37 <@scarabeus> ok put it straight: lets just comfor for now on that we are going to support unprefixing misc apps |
246 |
21:37 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work: And I think we haven't convinced everyone in the kde team that kde-4 is better |
247 |
21:37 * jmbsvicetto looks at yngwin |
248 |
21:37 <@cryos|work> I am not proposing we do - I am just pointing out what is happening. |
249 |
21:38 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work: I agree |
250 |
21:38 <@cryos|work> I think many distros dropped KDE 3 too soon. |
251 |
21:38 <+reavertm> kdeprefix as great idea and flexibility it adds, it's pain in ass to mantain :P |
252 |
21:39 <@cryos|work> I was more making the point that Gentoo has such an extreme amount of choice compared to other distros we could end up chasing bugs no-one else cares about that only crop up in slotted envs. |
253 |
21:39 <+reavertm> (btw, eselect for kde is not required) |
254 |
21:39 <@cryos|work> Reducing overall quality which is bad. Not claiming I have the answer either... ;-) |
255 |
21:40 <@scarabeus> :] |
256 |
21:40 <@jmbsvicetto> we're all brainstorming ;) |
257 |
21:40 <@jmbsvicetto> tampakrap: How's your work on the kde3 eclasses going? |
258 |
21:41 <@cryos|work> I am very attached to Gentoo and KDE. I don't want to see it go to crap, don't have as much time as I would like these days. |
259 |
21:41 <@tampakrap> eclasses are ready |
260 |
21:41 <@tampakrap> i'm still on the ebuilds |
261 |
21:41 <@scarabeus> and the packages are compilling fine? |
262 |
21:41 <@jmbsvicetto> tampakrap: kdeprefix isses on kde4 are hurting us, but colisions with kde3 apps are doing us more harm (imho) |
263 |
21:41 <@cryos|work> Bumped avogadro for the super nerdy people who want to play though ;-) |
264 |
21:41 <@tampakrap> i'll tell you what i need |
265 |
21:41 <@tampakrap> if there are two people willing to test kde3 misc apps that would be greate |
266 |
21:42 <@tampakrap> great |
267 |
21:42 <@scarabeus> herd testers i bet |
268 |
21:42 * wired raises hand |
269 |
21:42 <@yngwin> evening |
270 |
21:42 <@scarabeus> also write mail to desktop and dev |
271 |
21:42 <+wired> yngwin: =] |
272 |
21:42 <@jmbsvicetto> tampakrap: with kde4 env? |
273 |
21:42 <@alexxy> cryos|work: i'll test it with students (avogadro) |
274 |
21:42 <+reavertm> btw, masking kdeprefix is good idea for typical users |
275 |
21:42 * yngwin completely forgot about the meeting, sry |
276 |
21:42 <@tampakrap> i'll prepare a list with the packages and eapi2 as well them |
277 |
21:42 <@jmbsvicetto> tampakrap: if so, I can do some tests |
278 |
21:42 <@cryos|work> alexxy: Great - I fixed the desktop file among many other things... |
279 |
21:42 <@tampakrap> i'm on kde-base only still |
280 |
21:42 <@alexxy> reavertm: yep |
281 |
21:43 <+reavertm> I guess it should be done when 4.2.2 is introduced |
282 |
21:43 <@cryos|work> reavertm: That was always my point - typical users don't want/understand kdeprefix. If they do they will unmask and use. |
283 |
21:43 <@alexxy> i think kdeprefix is not for users |
284 |
21:43 <@alexxy> =) |
285 |
21:43 <@cryos|work> It is awesome for devs/power users though. |
286 |
21:43 <+wired> many users activate it without knowing though, mask++ |
287 |
21:43 <+krytzz> hm... i thought gentoo is for powerusers? |
288 |
21:43 <@jmbsvicetto> cryos|work: iirc, kdeprefix is no longer an IUSE default |
289 |
21:44 <+reavertm> I want 4.2.2 stable in portage, so let make it easier for users to use |
290 |
21:44 * yngwin is with krytzz |
291 |
21:44 <@scarabeus> krytzz: you. sent. ssh key. me. now |
292 |
21:44 <@cryos|work> jmbsvicetto: I didn't know it ever was. |
293 |
21:44 <+reavertm> jmbsvicetto: yeah, but still users see USe flag and enable it out of curiosity :P |
294 |
21:44 <+wired> krytzz: the definition of a poweruser is amazingly flexible these days.... |
295 |
21:44 <+krytzz> scarabeus: ok, few minutes |
296 |
21:44 <+krytzz> wired: ok well |
297 |
21:44 <@scarabeus> cryos|work: YOU CHANGED IT TO ENABLED BY DEFAULT FIRST :D |
298 |
21:44 <@scarabeus> heh caps |
299 |
21:45 <@cryos|work> Many Gentoo users are not what I would call power users, but I guess by definition we have more advanced users than *buntu for example.. |
300 |
21:45 <@cryos|work> scarabeus: For :live only! |
301 |
21:45 <+wired> we also have a lot of users who'd want to be powerusers |
302 |
21:45 <@alexxy> he he =) |
303 |
21:45 <+wired> =] |
304 |
21:45 <@yngwin> i'd say gentoo targets powerusers |
305 |
21:46 <@yngwin> doesnt mean all our users are tho |
306 |
21:46 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: well, that's the same thing as CFLAGS. Gentoo's policy has never been to hide it from the user - even if that leads to user bitting himself in the rear ;) |
307 |
21:46 <+krytzz> wired: lol |
308 |
21:46 <+reavertm> btw, our existing problems with kdeprefix *only* phonon and pykde |
309 |
21:47 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: +affect? |
310 |
21:47 <@scarabeus> ok back on topic tampakrap are you able to get needed stuff around here or you need our direct intervention (ak more devs searching for testing monkeys?) |
311 |
21:47 <+reavertm> jmbsvicetto: hmm? |
312 |
21:47 <@tampakrap> no just some testing mostly |
313 |
21:48 <@tampakrap> i don't think we should waste more manpower on kde3 |
314 |
21:48 * wired now that we're all here, can someone pretty please cp the latest .2 tbz2s to d.ge.o? |
315 |
21:48 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: never mind |
316 |
21:48 <+reavertm> ah, right - phonon and pykde4 - the only really kdeprefix *issue* |
317 |
21:48 <+reavertm> the rest is just inconvenience |
318 |
21:49 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: The phonon issue is mostly upstream "hard-coding" the plugins location, right? |
319 |
21:49 <@scarabeus> ok so kde3 is moving forward, i would say that we need to have it done by end of april some time on may... so we can actualy stable the kde4 |
320 |
21:49 <+reavertm> I can easily not drop kdeprefix and install 3rd party apps with kde they were built against (still changing need_kde behaviour) |
321 |
21:50 -!- smith_ [n=smith_@××××××××××××××××××××××××××.ch] has joined #gentoo-kde |
322 |
21:50 <+reavertm> phonon issue is bunding KDE plugins with phonon |
323 |
21:50 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: we need to go for 3.5.10 stable *soon* |
324 |
21:50 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: btw i would like to mask the kde |
325 |
21:50 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: old nonsplit stuff i mean |
326 |
21:50 <+reavertm> hence, phonon should be in location visihble by all KDE releases |
327 |
21:50 <@jmbsvicetto> 3.5.9? |
328 |
21:50 <+reavertm> or kdeprefixed |
329 |
21:51 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: yes |
330 |
21:51 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: Not without 3.5.10 stable! |
331 |
21:51 -!- mikkoc [n=mikko@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.it] has quit [Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)] |
332 |
21:51 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: unless you're the one doing it and I can redirect all bugs, mails, threats, ... to you :P |
333 |
21:51 <@yngwin> well, we can leave split 3.5.9 unmasked, and just mask the monolithic pkgs |
334 |
21:52 <@jmbsvicetto> yngwin: we could, but we have quite vocal users already complaining about the drop of the monos for 3.5.10 |
335 |
21:52 <+reavertm> or just put proper blocks |
336 |
21:52 <@yngwin> then when 3.5.10 is stable, we can mask the rest |
337 |
21:52 <@yngwin> jmbsvicetto: well, too bad, i'd say |
338 |
21:52 -!- mikkoc [n=mikko@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.it] has joined #gentoo-kde |
339 |
21:52 <@jmbsvicetto> ok |
340 |
21:52 <@yngwin> or someone must stand up to become monolithic maintainer |
341 |
21:53 <+reavertm> jmbsvicetto: who are those vocal users? |
342 |
21:53 -!- anselmolsm_ [n=anselmo@200.184.118.130] has joined #gentoo-kde |
343 |
21:53 <+reavertm> devs by occasion? |
344 |
21:53 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: no |
345 |
21:53 <+reavertm> idf so, let them step up to maintain :P |
346 |
21:53 -!- anselmolsm [n=anselmo@200.184.118.130] has quit [Read error: 113 (No route to host)] |
347 |
21:54 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: hehe, wait until you become a dev and you'll see how "demanding" some users can be ;) |
348 |
21:54 <+reavertm> and what was basis for their objections? |
349 |
21:54 -!- anselmolsm_ is now known as anselmolsm |
350 |
21:55 <+reavertm> write migrating guide (if there's no already) and that's all. period |
351 |
21:55 <@yngwin> we've had that for years |
352 |
21:55 <@scarabeus> yeah i was speaking about the monos |
353 |
21:55 <@jmbsvicetto> Some people just want monos. I haven't seen many and in particular good motives. But they want them, nonetheless |
354 |
21:55 <+reavertm> Qt4 split was much more difficult yet it was done |
355 |
21:55 <+reavertm> jmbsvicetto: I want reiser4 in gentoo-sources and? |
356 |
21:55 <@jmbsvicetto> ok, ok |
357 |
21:56 <+reavertm> some people want some things and they won't have it nevertheless :P |
358 |
21:56 <@yngwin> use hitchhiker-sources then |
359 |
21:56 <@jmbsvicetto> When they knock at my door I'll be sure to point them somewhere else ;) |
360 |
21:56 * cryos|work has a meeting... Bye! |
361 |
21:56 <+krytzz> bye |
362 |
21:56 <@jmbsvicetto> bye cryos|work |
363 |
21:56 <+reavertm> jmbsvicetto: let me brainwash them then |
364 |
21:56 <+reavertm> bye cryos|work |
365 |
21:56 <+wired> bye cryos|work |
366 |
21:56 * cryos|work will try to contribute more this month! |
367 |
21:56 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: sorry for the disturbance. |
368 |
21:57 <@jmbsvicetto> So, about kdeprefix we're done, right? |
369 |
21:57 <@scarabeus> bb |
370 |
21:57 <@scarabeus> yes |
371 |
21:57 <@scarabeus> kde3 and kdeprefix is done |
372 |
21:57 <@jmbsvicetto> about 3.5 tampakrap will do more tests and is searching for people to help with kde-misc apps |
373 |
21:57 -!- mx-tvt [n=quassel@××××××××××××××××××××××.pt] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] |
374 |
21:57 <+reavertm> I'll see what i can do - anyway i propose some my changes in eclass anyway as it's much shorter and easier to read now |
375 |
21:57 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: What's next? |
376 |
21:58 <+reavertm> plasmoids to tree |
377 |
21:58 <+reavertm> pros/cons :) |
378 |
21:58 <@scarabeus> yeah i think we can start adding them |
379 |
21:58 <@scarabeus> we cook them since pre 4.1 and still in the overaly |
380 |
21:58 <@scarabeus> so lets make users happy |
381 |
21:58 <+reavertm> I haven't tested all of them yet |
382 |
21:58 <@jmbsvicetto> They're in kde-misc now, right? |
383 |
21:59 <@scarabeus> i will add only those i personaly tested |
384 |
21:59 <@yngwin> reavertm: that's what ~arch is for |
385 |
21:59 <@yngwin> :p |
386 |
21:59 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: yes i did the move, actualy forced wire to move it |
387 |
21:59 <+wired> i've tried them all at least once |
388 |
21:59 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: In that case I have nothing to say ;) |
389 |
21:59 <+reavertm> anyway i already found one problem - systemmontor or sth has been moved to kdeplasma-addons and conflicts with kdeplasma-addons:live |
390 |
21:59 <@scarabeus> ok i just want to hear OK :D |
391 |
21:59 <+reavertm> about plasmoids |
392 |
21:59 <+wired> most of them get regular updates btw and there are a lot more available in kde-look |
393 |
21:59 <+reavertm> let me check them 1st |
394 |
21:59 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: we can add a block on a slot package |
395 |
22:00 <+reavertm> I fixed most deps in kde-misc but still something may be wrond there |
396 |
22:00 <+wired> i think most plasmoids are simple enough to be safely added to ~ |
397 |
22:00 <+reavertm> wired applied blocks already |
398 |
22:00 <@scarabeus> ok this one was quick |
399 |
22:00 <@scarabeus> so we just test them and start moving |
400 |
22:00 <@scarabeus> :] |
401 |
22:01 <@scarabeus> next is printing |
402 |
22:01 <@scarabeus> reavertm: how is it looking |
403 |
22:01 <+reavertm> printing.. |
404 |
22:01 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: what are we missing? The deps? |
405 |
22:01 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: we have everything |
406 |
22:01 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: the problem is it pulls half of gnome |
407 |
22:01 <+reavertm> if I leave it as it is now - system-config-printer-kde is done, printer-applet not yet |
408 |
22:01 <+reavertm> scarabeus: no longer |
409 |
22:01 <@scarabeus> the better then |
410 |
22:02 <@scarabeus> ok so i will coordinate it with you after 4.2.2 is released (weekend probably) |
411 |
22:02 <@scarabeus> reavertm: agreed |
412 |
22:02 <@scarabeus> ? |
413 |
22:02 <+reavertm> just let me finish printer-applet the way I did system-config-printer-kde (taking some files from system-config-printer) and they can go |
414 |
22:02 <+reavertm> scarabeus: yeah |
415 |
22:03 <@scarabeus> ok cool then |
416 |
22:03 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: do we have any response on the snapshot thingie? |
417 |
22:03 <+reavertm> I made system-config-printer-kde is totally independent from system-config-printer |
418 |
22:03 <@jmbsvicetto> Not that I have seen |
419 |
22:03 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: I sent the mail 2 days ago, though. |
420 |
22:03 <@alexxy> so they simply ignoring us |
421 |
22:03 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: ok so alexxy will have to do it himself for all the time |
422 |
22:04 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: I think as cryos|work was suggesting, we ignore them for now and keep doing the work alexxy is doing |
423 |
22:04 <@scarabeus> alexxy: btw i heared some noise about l10n not working |
424 |
22:04 <@alexxy> scarabeus: its working for -kdeprefix |
425 |
22:04 <+reavertm> Dirk was in kde-devel for a minute |
426 |
22:04 <@alexxy> didnt test it with +kdeprefix |
427 |
22:04 <@alexxy> =) |
428 |
22:04 -!- mkyral [n=maros@×××××××××××××.cz] has left #gentoo-kde [] |
429 |
22:04 <@scarabeus> ok then it is their issue they can fix it |
430 |
22:05 -!- sIbOk [i=sNOUbOR@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.net] has joined #gentoo-kde |
431 |
22:05 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: again one more on you |
432 |
22:05 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: how is dead member removing |
433 |
22:05 <@scarabeus> going on |
434 |
22:05 <@jmbsvicetto> I'm going to go over the retirement bugs (I think a few of them have already retired) and will then send mails to the folks that haven't been around for a long time |
435 |
22:06 <@jmbsvicetto> I'll have the page cleaned by next meeting |
436 |
22:06 <@scarabeus> ok |
437 |
22:07 <@scarabeus> pykde |
438 |
22:07 <@scarabeus> bonsaikitten: |
439 |
22:07 <@scarabeus> so you say it works |
440 |
22:07 <@scarabeus> despite the bugs in bugzilla |
441 |
22:07 <@bonsaikitten> I haven't been able to reproduce |
442 |
22:07 <+reavertm> problem with pykde4 is kdeprefix |
443 |
22:07 <@bonsaikitten> I guess I'll need to change my testing strategy :) |
444 |
22:07 <+reavertm> all kde installs pykde4 in site-packages |
445 |
22:07 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: build or runtime error? |
446 |
22:07 <@alexxy> so lets mask kdeprefix use flag |
447 |
22:07 <@alexxy> =) |
448 |
22:07 <+reavertm> install |
449 |
22:07 <@alexxy> like it was for networkmanager |
450 |
22:07 <+reavertm> so - two choices |
451 |
22:07 <@scarabeus> there was sip buildtime errors |
452 |
22:08 <+reavertm> make eselect module or slot them properly |
453 |
22:08 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: I have pykde-4.2.1 installed with +kdeprefix here |
454 |
22:08 -!- kamik [n=quassel@×××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.net] has joined #gentoo-kde |
455 |
22:08 <+reavertm> so that pykde4 live will go to /usr/kde/live and so on |
456 |
22:08 <+reavertm> jmbsvicetto: install pykde4-9999 as well |
457 |
22:08 <+reavertm> you need package.provided entry now to do it |
458 |
22:09 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: I'm not running live ebuilds here |
459 |
22:09 <+reavertm> well, some people are :) |
460 |
22:09 <@jmbsvicetto> sure, I'm just conveying my experience here |
461 |
22:09 <@scarabeus> one +kdeprefix is ok |
462 |
22:09 <@scarabeus> more than one kdeprefix is fail |
463 |
22:09 <@scarabeus> for pykde |
464 |
22:09 <@jmbsvicetto> ah, ok |
465 |
22:10 <+reavertm> hell, it even install files in /usr/share/sip |
466 |
22:10 <+reavertm> (apart from site-packages) |
467 |
22:11 <+reavertm> bonsaikitten: some QA notice says that precompiled modules need to go to site-packages |
468 |
22:11 <@bonsaikitten> :( |
469 |
22:11 <+reavertm> is it possible to create external site packages in kde slot? (/usr/kde/4.2 etc) |
470 |
22:12 <+reavertm> and set some PYTHON_PATH or whatever in startkde? |
471 |
22:12 <@jmbsvicetto> This is why having multiple versions around in /usr is going to be "messy" :\ |
472 |
22:13 <+reavertm> bonsaikitten: what useful python env variables do you know that would help here? :) |
473 |
22:13 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: perhaps the correct solution here would be to remove the python files and have a single package that is used by all versions? |
474 |
22:13 <+reavertm> that is also possible but... |
475 |
22:14 <+reavertm> pykde4 happeds to install /usr/kde/live/lib64/kde4/kpythonpluginfactory.so |
476 |
22:14 <+reavertm> which is in kdeprefixed location |
477 |
22:14 <@jmbsvicetto> if they didn't break abi compatibility, it should be possible to use the latest pykde version with earlier 4.X releases |
478 |
22:14 <+reavertm> installing it in /usr prefix is the same thing like installing kde-misc in /usr |
479 |
22:15 <+reavertm> (may not work - like this plugin thing I'm struggling with) |
480 |
22:16 <+reavertm> yes, I'm not worrying about linking, it should work - still ebuild would need some tweaks to make it build not agains kde release it is from but minimal installed |
481 |
22:16 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: pkgconfig!! |
482 |
22:16 <@scarabeus> he he he |
483 |
22:16 <@scarabeus> again prefix you |
484 |
22:16 <@scarabeus> SILENCE |
485 |
22:16 <@scarabeus> :D |
486 |
22:17 <+reavertm> what is pkgconfig going to solve? |
487 |
22:17 <@alexxy> lets mask kdeprefix =) |
488 |
22:17 <+reavertm> buildig is no longer an issue :P |
489 |
22:17 <+reavertm> running is :) |
490 |
22:17 <@jmbsvicetto> If they were using autotools they could use pkgconfig to chose the minimum so version needed |
491 |
22:18 <+reavertm> jmbsvicetto: ah, eclass does it already |
492 |
22:18 <+reavertm> (picks lowest kdelibs, yet >=KDE_MINIMAL) |
493 |
22:18 <@scarabeus> ok i gues we are done with the pykde :P |
494 |
22:18 <+reavertm> are we? |
495 |
22:18 <@yngwin> hardmask? |
496 |
22:18 <+reavertm> what's the solution then :P |
497 |
22:18 <@scarabeus> yeah lets kitten handle it |
498 |
22:19 <@scarabeus> also write whiny mail on dev |
499 |
22:19 <+reavertm> I'd slot the f*er |
500 |
22:19 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: hehe - solution? hand it over to Patrick ;) |
501 |
22:20 <+reavertm> along with phonon |
502 |
22:20 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: yup |
503 |
22:20 -!- cypr1nus [n=cypr1nus@×××××××××××××××××.pl] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)] |
504 |
22:20 <@scarabeus> (i am practising my "solid-rock" face) |
505 |
22:20 <+reavertm> or ,If I get plugins in /usr to work, it will be solved |
506 |
22:20 <@scarabeus> :] |
507 |
22:21 <@scarabeus> so, um, what was next, ah, koffice2 |
508 |
22:21 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: I haven't looked at that in a long time, but can't you specify more than 1 RPATH? |
509 |
22:21 <@jmbsvicetto> reavertm: more than 1 dir in RPATH |
510 |
22:21 <+reavertm> RPATH is not problem, they are all linked well, just app can't find those plugins |
511 |
22:21 <@jmbsvicetto> isn't it supposed to look in the compiled RPATH? |
512 |
22:22 <+reavertm> I am yet to check some things |
513 |
22:22 <+reavertm> for plugins? no |
514 |
22:22 <+reavertm> RPATh is just for linker |
515 |
22:22 -!- neuron [n=neuron@85.252.65.217] has joined #gentoo-kde |
516 |
22:23 -!- Civil [n=Civilian@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.ru] has quit [Remote closed the connection] |
517 |
22:23 <+reavertm> if plugins are in /usr/kde/XXX/lib64/kde/ and /usr/kde/XXX/lib64/kde/plugins - app needs to know where to find them |
518 |
22:24 <+reavertm> (usually just works if app was comopiled against kde XXX and istalled in /usr/kde/XXX |
519 |
22:24 <+reavertm> otherwise it fails to find them even when KDEDIRS and QT_PLUGIN_PATh is pointed there |
520 |
22:25 <+reavertm> yet I'm to test some things so we'll see - it should work somehow |
521 |
22:25 -!- cypr1nus [n=cypr1nus@×××××××××××××××××.pl] has joined #gentoo-kde |
522 |
22:25 -!- looonger [n=looonger@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.pl] has quit [Client Quit] |
523 |
22:25 <+reavertm> I have manually compiled kdevelop in ~/kde4 and my KDEDIRS just points there and it workds |
524 |
22:26 <+reavertm> so maybe it's something with building it gentoo way |
525 |
22:26 <+reavertm> (I guess I'll try kdeprefix-less kdevelop...) |
526 |
22:27 -!- _Phlogi [n=quassel@×××××××××××××××××××××××××.ch] has joined #gentoo-kde |
527 |
22:27 <+reavertm> ok, what's next? |
528 |
22:27 -!- non7top [n=non7top@94.77.134.21] has quit [Remote closed the connection] |
529 |
22:27 <@scarabeus> koffice |
530 |
22:28 <+reavertm> I built kword and it works |
531 |
22:28 <@scarabeus> the state is i fixed the crap |
532 |
22:28 <@scarabeus> it works |
533 |
22:28 <@scarabeus> problem is that it is not much usable |
534 |
22:28 <@scarabeus> they are going to release it at the end of this month |
535 |
22:28 <@scarabeus> so i will add it to the tree |
536 |
22:28 <+reavertm> 2.0? oh crap |
537 |
22:28 <@scarabeus> but i am not sure if it should go masked or not |
538 |
22:28 <@scarabeus> 2.0 indeed |
539 |
22:29 <+krytzz> released? oh zomg :p |
540 |
22:29 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: maybe we should get an rc in the tree first, no? |
541 |
22:29 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: ideas? |
542 |
22:29 <@scarabeus> well i have the tarball and it is just matter of renaming |
543 |
22:29 <@scarabeus> anyone can do it |
544 |
22:29 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: the rc could be masked and pending bug reports, 2.0 would be unmasked or not |
545 |
22:30 <@jmbsvicetto> The 2.0 tarball? |
546 |
22:30 <+reavertm> btw, let someone just in any case look at those ebuilds and see whether deps are correct (rdepend, depend, commondepend handled carefully) |
547 |
22:30 <@scarabeus> yeah i am worried about it and in doubts |
548 |
22:30 <@scarabeus> it definetly is stable |
549 |
22:31 <@scarabeus> but it lacks some features and it looks just ugly |
550 |
22:31 <@tampakrap> i like the :live one though |
551 |
22:31 <@tampakrap> haven't tested the releases |
552 |
22:31 <@tampakrap> maybe we can create snapshots |
553 |
22:32 <@scarabeus> what for |
554 |
22:32 <@scarabeus> i have todays taged rc1 |
555 |
22:32 <@scarabeus> :D |
556 |
22:32 <@tampakrap> ok then |
557 |
22:32 <+reavertm> KOffice 1.9.99.0 RC1 uploaded |
558 |
22:32 <@scarabeus> not yet, it is on ktown :] |
559 |
22:32 <+reavertm> just pasted announcement |
560 |
22:32 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: so what do you thing the stable at the end of the month as pure testing or hardmasked? |
561 |
22:33 <@jmbsvicetto> I haven't used koffice myself, so I'm not sure |
562 |
22:34 <@jmbsvicetto> But if you're in doubt, try pusing something masked into the tree and check for bug reports |
563 |
22:34 <@scarabeus> ok |
564 |
22:34 <@scarabeus> good idea |
565 |
22:35 -!- Varox [n=Varox@××××××××××××××××××××××.net] has joined #gentoo-kde |
566 |
22:35 <@scarabeus> last thing on the list: |
567 |
22:35 <@scarabeus> moving the meeting date |
568 |
22:35 <@scarabeus> i would like to see meeting 14 days before upstream release for public |
569 |
22:35 <@jmbsvicetto> pushing* |
570 |
22:35 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: releases what? ;) |
571 |
22:36 <@tampakrap> we don't have much to talk before release i think |
572 |
22:36 <@scarabeus> kde |
573 |
22:36 <@scarabeus> we are kde team |
574 |
22:36 <@tampakrap> after release is everything that comes in surface |
575 |
22:36 -!- sIbOk [i=sNOUbOR@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.net] has quit ["kUALKIER hiJO dE pUTA sAbE lO q dARTE sI tIENE q dOLERTE pERO No kUALKIER hiJO dE pUTA sABE lO q dARTE sI tIENE q gUSTARTE, y] |
576 |
22:37 -!- helch [n=helch@××××××××××××××××××××××××××.ch] has quit [Remote closed the connection] |
577 |
22:38 <@scarabeus> hmm |
578 |
22:38 <@scarabeus> what does other think? |
579 |
22:39 <+krytzz> hm |
580 |
22:39 -!- Phlogi [n=quassel@×××××××××××××××××××××××××.ch] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] |
581 |
22:40 <+wired> maybe a week is enough? |
582 |
22:40 <+krytzz> i would agree with tampakrap i think, but i have nothing against short-dated meetings |
583 |
22:40 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: floating schedule or point to 3rd Thursday of the month? |
584 |
22:40 <@scarabeus> 3rd thursday i had on my mind |
585 |
22:40 <+krytzz> when $PANIC_LEVEL reaches 10 would be good :p |
586 |
22:41 <@scarabeus> well or 4th week |
587 |
22:41 <@jmbsvicetto> krytzz: Isn't it too late by then? ;) |
588 |
22:41 <@scarabeus> the problem is that release is today |
589 |
22:41 <+krytzz> k... 9? :p |
590 |
22:41 <@jmbsvicetto> scarabeus: 4th will hit council meetings |
591 |
22:41 <@scarabeus> ok i will write to summary what ever you decide :] |
592 |
22:42 <@jmbsvicetto> I think 3rd would be better, but am open to other dates |
593 |
22:42 <@yngwin> 3rd sounds good |
594 |
22:43 -!- MaNI [n=malcolm@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.za] has joined #gentoo-kde |
595 |
22:45 <@scarabeus> ok i go for 3rd too then |
596 |
22:45 <@jmbsvicetto> So, what are we missing? |
597 |
22:45 <@tampakrap> one last joke |
598 |
22:45 <@tampakrap> hwoarang wants me to change my cloak to gentoo/slacker/tampakrap |
599 |
22:46 <@scarabeus> hm and you could not write this yesterda |
600 |
22:46 <+krytzz> hehe |
601 |
22:47 <@alexxy> he he =) |
602 |
22:47 -!- g1lt [n=quassel@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.net] has joined #gentoo-kde |
603 |
22:48 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: http://dpaste.com/22343/ |
604 |
22:48 <@scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: again no log, i didnt reboot my client yet :D |
605 |
22:48 <@scarabeus> uptime 48 days cant be ruined :D |
606 |
22:50 <@jmbsvicetto> hehe |
607 |
22:50 <@jmbsvicetto> tampakrap: You have a long road to go before you qualify for that :P |
608 |
22:50 <@jmbsvicetto> tampakrap: We have real "slacker" experts around here ;) |
609 |
22:50 <@tampakrap> i don't think so, take a look at my cia.vc page |
610 |
22:51 <@jmbsvicetto> So are we done? |
611 |
22:51 <@tampakrap> yes, where is the summary? |
612 |
22:51 * reavertm unpauses music |
613 |
22:52 <@jmbsvicetto> In that case, let me remind people that we still have a *few* open bugs and that we should all try to help get that number down |
614 |
22:52 <@scarabeus> tampakrap: http://dpaste.com/22343/ |
615 |
22:52 <@scarabeus> yeah and ehm officaly meeting is over ;] |