1 |
commit: 47d312a25cc0d8c6917787a41a37c4e73d7d0eab |
2 |
Author: Rick Farina <zerochaos <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
3 |
AuthorDate: Fri Sep 30 13:51:51 2022 +0000 |
4 |
Commit: Rick Farina <zerochaos <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
5 |
CommitDate: Fri Sep 30 13:53:22 2022 +0000 |
6 |
URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=47d312a2 |
7 |
|
8 |
net-libs/libhackrf: build only shared lib (no-op) |
9 |
|
10 |
So, this actually does nothing, because the applied patch ALSO builds |
11 |
only shared libs. That said, it's the first step toward not needing the |
12 |
patch and I don't want to forget later when/if upstream fixes their bug |
13 |
which won't allow install for only shared libs. |
14 |
|
15 |
Signed-off-by: Rick Farina <zerochaos <AT> gentoo.org> |
16 |
|
17 |
net-libs/libhackrf/libhackrf-2022.09.1.ebuild | 4 ++++ |
18 |
net-libs/libhackrf/libhackrf-9999.ebuild | 4 ++++ |
19 |
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) |
20 |
|
21 |
diff --git a/net-libs/libhackrf/libhackrf-2022.09.1.ebuild b/net-libs/libhackrf/libhackrf-2022.09.1.ebuild |
22 |
index 586e9f4bd1ec..126023d3e828 100644 |
23 |
--- a/net-libs/libhackrf/libhackrf-2022.09.1.ebuild |
24 |
+++ b/net-libs/libhackrf/libhackrf-2022.09.1.ebuild |
25 |
@@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ src_configure() { |
26 |
cmake_src_configure |
27 |
} |
28 |
|
29 |
+src_compile() { |
30 |
+ cmake_build hackrf |
31 |
+} |
32 |
+ |
33 |
pkg_postinst() { |
34 |
if use udev; then |
35 |
einfo "Users in the usb group can use hackrf." |
36 |
|
37 |
diff --git a/net-libs/libhackrf/libhackrf-9999.ebuild b/net-libs/libhackrf/libhackrf-9999.ebuild |
38 |
index 586e9f4bd1ec..126023d3e828 100644 |
39 |
--- a/net-libs/libhackrf/libhackrf-9999.ebuild |
40 |
+++ b/net-libs/libhackrf/libhackrf-9999.ebuild |
41 |
@@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ src_configure() { |
42 |
cmake_src_configure |
43 |
} |
44 |
|
45 |
+src_compile() { |
46 |
+ cmake_build hackrf |
47 |
+} |
48 |
+ |
49 |
pkg_postinst() { |
50 |
if use udev; then |
51 |
einfo "Users in the usb group can use hackrf." |