Gentoo Archives: gentoo-commits

From: "Ulrich Müller" <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-commits@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-commits] data/glep:master commit in: /
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 15:00:59
Message-Id: 1518009727.a9971615ef69dbb26f04af2c9fd1cddd1ec6d626.ulm@gentoo
1 commit: a9971615ef69dbb26f04af2c9fd1cddd1ec6d626
2 Author: Michał Górny <mgorny <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
3 AuthorDate: Sun Jan 28 08:55:35 2018 +0000
4 Commit: Ulrich Müller <ulm <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
5 CommitDate: Wed Feb 7 13:22:07 2018 +0000
6 URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/glep.git/commit/?id=a9971615
7
8 glep-0075: Include argument on injected distfiles
9
10 Include the argument that we have injected distfiles as noted
11 on the bug by Robin. Inclusion suggested by Michael Orlitzky.
12
13 glep-0075.rst | 5 ++++-
14 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
15
16 diff --git a/glep-0075.rst b/glep-0075.rst
17 index c0a1d5c..ced1231 100644
18 --- a/glep-0075.rst
19 +++ b/glep-0075.rst
20 @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ to split them further.
21
22 The alternate option of using file hash has the advantage of having
23 a more balanced split. Furthermore, since hashes are stored
24 -in Manifests using them is zero-cost. However, this solution has two
25 +in Manifests using them is zero-cost. However, this solution has three
26 significant disadvantages:
27
28 1. The hash values are unknown for newly-downloaded distfiles, so
29 @@ -216,6 +216,9 @@ significant disadvantages:
30 hash mismatches would be placed in the wrong subdirectory,
31 potentially causing confusing errors.
32
33 +3. Not all files in the distfiles tree are covered by package Manifests
34 + --- there are additional files that are injected into distfiles.
35 +
36 Using filename hashes has proven to provide a similar balance
37 to using file hashes. Furthermore, since filenames are known up front
38 this solution does not suffer from the both listed problems. While