Gentoo Archives: gentoo-commits

From: "Zac Medico (zmedico)" <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-commits@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-commits] portage r14740 - main/branches/2.1.7/pym/portage
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:55:41
Message-Id: E1N2ux0-0003qO-8Y@stork.gentoo.org
1 Author: zmedico
2 Date: 2009-10-27 22:55:37 +0000 (Tue, 27 Oct 2009)
3 New Revision: 14740
4
5 Modified:
6 main/branches/2.1.7/pym/portage/__init__.py
7 Log:
8 Add a reference to bug #141118 inside _expand_new_virtuals(). (trunk r14732)
9
10 Modified: main/branches/2.1.7/pym/portage/__init__.py
11 ===================================================================
12 --- main/branches/2.1.7/pym/portage/__init__.py 2009-10-27 22:55:28 UTC (rev 14739)
13 +++ main/branches/2.1.7/pym/portage/__init__.py 2009-10-27 22:55:37 UTC (rev 14740)
14 @@ -7651,8 +7651,10 @@
15
16 def _expand_new_virtuals(mysplit, edebug, mydbapi, mysettings, myroot="/",
17 trees=None, use_mask=None, use_force=None, **kwargs):
18 - """Recursively expand new-style virtuals so as to collapse one or more
19 - levels of indirection. In dep_zapdeps, new-style virtuals will be assigned
20 + """
21 + In order to solve bug #141118, recursively expand new-style virtuals so
22 + as to collapse one or more levels of indirection, generating an expanded
23 + search space. In dep_zapdeps, new-style virtuals will be assigned
24 zero cost regardless of whether or not they are currently installed. Virtual
25 blockers are supported but only when the virtual expands to a single
26 atom because it wouldn't necessarily make sense to block all the components