Gentoo Archives: gentoo-commits

From: "Ulrich Müller" <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-commits@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-commits] proj/devmanual:master commit in: keywording/
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:50:31
Message-Id: 1579785050.39f82639c14734efb1a8638952e17984b38a0023.ulm@gentoo
1 commit: 39f82639c14734efb1a8638952e17984b38a0023
2 Author: Ulrich Müller <ulm <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
3 AuthorDate: Thu Jan 23 13:10:50 2020 +0000
4 Commit: Ulrich Müller <ulm <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
5 CommitDate: Thu Jan 23 13:10:50 2020 +0000
6 URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/devmanual.git/commit/?id=39f82639
7
8 keywording: Follow the terminology defined at start of the section.
9
10 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/567312
11 Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm <AT> gentoo.org>
12
13 keywording/text.xml | 21 +++++++++++----------
14 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
15
16 diff --git a/keywording/text.xml b/keywording/text.xml
17 index 6b2d19c..4897186 100644
18 --- a/keywording/text.xml
19 +++ b/keywording/text.xml
20 @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ This also applies to revision bumps, not just to upstream version changes.
21 <body>
22
23 <p>
24 -Moving a package from <c>~arch</c> to <c>arch</c> is done only by the relevant arch teams.
25 +Moving an ebuild from <c>~arch</c> to <c>arch</c> is done only by the relevant arch teams.
26 If you have access to non-x86 hardware but are not on the arch teams, you may wish
27 to make individual arrangements <d /> the arch teams are happy for help, so long as
28 they know what is going on. Please note that <c>x86</c> is now no longer an exception
29 @@ -232,25 +232,26 @@ for further details.
30 </p>
31
32 <p>
33 -For a package to move to stable, the following guidelines must be met:
34 +For an ebuild to move to stable, the following guidelines must be met:
35 </p>
36
37 <ul>
38 <li>
39 - The package has spent a reasonable amount of time in <c>~arch</c> first. Thirty
40 - days is the usual figure, although this is clearly only a guideline. For
41 - critical packages, a much longer duration is expected. For small packages
42 - which have only minor changes between versions, a shorter period is sometimes
43 - appropriate.
44 + The ebuild has spent a reasonable amount of time in <c>~arch</c> first.
45 + Thirty days is the usual figure, although this is clearly only a guideline.
46 + For critical packages, a much longer duration is expected. For small
47 + packages that have only minor changes between versions, a shorter period is
48 + sometimes appropriate.
49 </li>
50 <li>
51 - The package must not have any non-<c>arch</c> dependencies.
52 + The ebuild must not have any non-<c>arch</c> dependencies.
53 </li>
54 <li>
55 - The package must not have any severe outstanding bugs or issues.
56 + The package version (and the ebuild) must not have any severe outstanding
57 + bugs or issues.
58 </li>
59 <li>
60 - The package must be widely tested.
61 + The package version must be widely tested.
62 </li>
63 <li>
64 If the package is a library, it should be known not to break any package which