1 |
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 09:59 -0500, Paul Varner wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 13:49 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
3 |
> > tove brought up an interesting point from GLEP 39: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > If any meeting has less than 50% attendance by council members, a |
6 |
> > new election for all places must be held within a month. The 'one |
7 |
> > year' is then reset from that point. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > musikc questioned whether that was only intended for the regular |
10 |
> > meetings or also irregular ones like this. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Open up the floodgates, folks. What do you think, what should we do? I |
13 |
> > look forward to hearing your advice. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Clarify the GLEP so that it refers to reqularly scheduled meetings only. |
16 |
> I see no reason to kick the council out and rehold elections over a |
17 |
> miscommunicated special meeting. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Regards, |
20 |
> Paul |
21 |
|
22 |
It's at least as hard to modify the GLEP as it is to follow it. And I |
23 |
don't think we want to be in the business of changing policies then |
24 |
applying the new policies retroactively. If we do that, what's the |
25 |
point of having policies in the first place? And, as ciaranm (one of |
26 |
the GLEP's authors) pointed out, the GLEP requires at least one open |
27 |
meeting per month, not regularly scheduled meetings. This month, |
28 |
Council scheduled two meetings, and the GLEP applies to all Council |
29 |
meetings. |
30 |
|
31 |
It's very hard to see how this meeting was "miscommunicated" since it |
32 |
was discussed in the 08.v.08 meeting, was called out in the summary for |
33 |
that meeting, and is there in the log file of course. I think we can |
34 |
expect the Council members to read the summaries of their own meetings, |
35 |
no? |
36 |
|
37 |
Regards, |
38 |
Ferris |
39 |
-- |
40 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
41 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) |