1 |
>>>>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, I wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Find below a proposed agenda for our next meeting. |
4 |
|
5 |
Find an updated version below. I'll post it to gentoo-council and |
6 |
gentoo-dev-announce tomorrow, unless there are objections. |
7 |
|
8 |
Ulrich |
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
1. Intro (10 minutes, including late arrivals) |
12 |
1.1. Make sure that at least a couple people are logging the meeting. |
13 |
1.2. Roll call. |
14 |
1.3. Does everyone agree to extend today's meeting to 90 minutes? |
15 |
|
16 |
2. Approve summary of October meeting (5 minutes) |
17 |
(in case it will be ready then) |
18 |
|
19 |
3. Follow-ups from previous meeting (15 minutes) |
20 |
3.1. EAPI 3 status (zmedico, ulm) |
21 |
3.2. Upgrade path for old systems (leio, solar) |
22 |
Should important system packages (e.g. Python) be reverted to |
23 |
EAPI 0, in order to provide a defined upgrade path? |
24 |
|
25 |
4. Prefix support in main Portage tree (grobian) (20 minutes) |
26 |
Fabian Groffen proposes that package managers should define the |
27 |
EPREFIX, EROOT, and ED variables (see [1] and replies). |
28 |
4.1. Does the council generally support this idea? |
29 |
4.2. Can it still be included in EAPI 3, or even in a fast EAPI 2.1? |
30 |
|
31 |
5. Usage of bash 3.2 features in Portage tree (patrick) (15 minutes) |
32 |
Should usage of bash 3.2 features in the Portage tree be forbidden, |
33 |
allowed, or should the issue be ignored? See [2] for details. |
34 |
|
35 |
6. Preservation of file modification times in EAPI 3 (ciaranm) (15 minutes) |
36 |
Agree upon a wording for PMS for the mtime modification change |
37 |
introduced to EAPI 3 last time. |
38 |
|
39 |
7. AOB / open floor (10 minutes) |
40 |
|
41 |
[1] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_2a62689c71f95e4de5699a330b8b5524.xml |
42 |
[2] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-council/msg_ed3cba3e0ded55c4e497451af46ea55b.xml |