| 1 |
Heya, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Am Donnerstag, den 25.02.2010, 19:42 -0700 schrieb Denis Dupeyron: |
| 4 |
> In a few words here is the problem. Is it a good idea to allow council |
| 5 |
> members to vote by email when they're not able to make it to the |
| 6 |
> meeting? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Yes, it is. (I thought we had agreed on considerung previously noted |
| 9 |
votes via mail, thus I mailed my votes before our last meething) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> If so how? Should that be done before or allowed to be done |
| 12 |
> after the meeting? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It should be up to the council member in question - if one feels he's |
| 15 |
able to vote before the meeting i see no problem with doing so. I've |
| 16 |
some ambivalent feelings about votes after a meeting though ... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Do we want to limit the number of members voting by |
| 19 |
> email for a given meeting? What do we do in case there are more votes |
| 20 |
> by email than the limit we set? Feel free to add more questions and |
| 21 |
> your opinion. This discussion isn't limited to council members by the |
| 22 |
> way. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
The number should be somewhat limited to make sure all council members |
| 25 |
who are able to attend a meeting are present. Having a 50% attendance |
| 26 |
limit for meetings allows us to have 3 members being able to vote by |
| 27 |
mail - that might work as an indirect limit. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
- Tobias |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Praxisbuch Nagios |
| 33 |
http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/pbnagiosger/ |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
https://www.xing.com/profile/Tobias_Scherbaum |
Archives