| 1 |
Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
> Why all council should be responsible for one? If council member fails |
| 3 |
> to find time to get to meetings then it's good for all if he leaves |
| 4 |
> council, but I don't see any reason to call new global vote. So it's |
| 5 |
> better to modify GLEP 39 and state that such council member should be |
| 6 |
> replaced using default replacement strategy, and could be elected again |
| 7 |
> (drop part elections about slackerness). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The election is just for a new single member, not for the whole |
| 10 |
council. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Mark Loeser |
| 14 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
| 15 |
email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
| 16 |
web - http://www.halcy0n.com |
Archives