Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54: _live or _scm?
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:15:07
Message-Id: 1244067387.5330.1.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54: _live or _scm? by Ulrich Mueller
On K, 2009-06-03 at 23:11 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Piotr Jaroszynski wrote: > > > on/after the last council meeting the biggest problem with g54 > > seemed to be whether to use scm or live suffix. I would like to do a > > small poll here among council members so that I can edit the glep > > accordingly. So, could you please state whether you prefer scm or > > live? > > I prefer "_live" for various reasons: > > - Almost everybody calls them "live ebuilds" not "scm ebuilds" > - There may be live ebuilds not related to source code management > (app-portage/eclass-manpages might be an example), and ebuilds > fetching their sources from a fixed tag in an SCM system, therefore > not being live. > - No confusion with the Scheme language. > > Ulrich
I prefer "live" for the same reasons above "scm" in any contexts relating to ebuilds. This vote (of mine) is not to be taken as an endorsement of g54 of course, as I take it as a terminology preference question. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: leio@g.o Weblog:


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54: _live or _scm? "Piotr JaroszyƄski" <peper@g.o>