1 |
>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> We can considerably shorten this discussion, because it boils down |
4 |
>> to the following: PMS is an official Gentoo document, and therefore |
5 |
>> it's not upon you to make this decision. |
6 |
|
7 |
> Alright. We'll escalate this to the Council then. |
8 |
|
9 |
No need for that, as it has already been voted on in the 2008-04-10 |
10 |
council meeting (repeating it, as you've added gentoo-council to CC): |
11 |
|
12 |
| The council voted that kdebuild-1 and other unapproved EAPIs could |
13 |
| not be in an approved PMS document. The spec isn't a place for |
14 |
| proposals or things that will never be submitted for approval by the |
15 |
| council. It's a specification, a reference of what is allowed in the |
16 |
| main tree. |
17 |
|
18 |
> In the mean time, I'll give Christian a day or two to revert every |
19 |
> patch he's applied recently that didn't follow the Council-mandated |
20 |
> review process, or I can do the revert for him if he doesn't have |
21 |
> time himself. |
22 |
|
23 |
Don't. |
24 |
|
25 |
Ulrich |