1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 2008.05.20 21:31, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
[snip] |
7 |
|
8 |
> To get some movement here, I'd like to get a concrete response from |
9 |
> the council in this thread for how we should proceed. Here's some |
10 |
> options that have been mentioned: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> 1) Have an election now; |
13 |
|
14 |
After a week, I don't see how the council can do anything else. |
15 |
|
16 |
> |
17 |
> 2) Hold a 1-week vote asking all devs whether we should have |
18 |
> elections; |
19 |
|
20 |
A vote about a vote seems like wasting time if you don't get the answer |
21 |
you want. |
22 |
|
23 |
> 3) Say that last week's nonmeeting didn't count for any of these |
24 |
> reasons: it was (a) poorly announced, (b) not voted on by a |
25 |
> council |
26 |
> majority or (c) not a regularly scheduled meeting; or |
27 |
|
28 |
Too late. |
29 |
|
30 |
> |
31 |
> 4) Something else. (What?) |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Which one do you prefer? |
34 |
|
35 |
Whatever you do you will upset someone. Its only 6 weeks until the |
36 |
normal election process kicks off anyway, so may as well go for it |
37 |
early and add 'fix GLEP 39' to your manifestos. |
38 |
|
39 |
> |
40 |
> Thanks, |
41 |
> Donnie |
42 |
> -- |
43 |
> gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list |
44 |
> |
45 |
|
46 |
I hope you all stand again. Its the GLEP that's broken, not the council |
47 |
but to gain a clear mandate to fix it, it looks like you have to go to |
48 |
the electorate. |
49 |
|
50 |
- -- |
51 |
Regards, |
52 |
|
53 |
Roy Bamford |
54 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
55 |
gentoo-ops |
56 |
forum-mods |
57 |
treecleaners |
58 |
trustees |
59 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
60 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
61 |
|
62 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkgzPEAACgkQTE4/y7nJvauhYwCePNPvZZuTbho17H7lE68FLsaj |
63 |
c0oAmwafhhiOGItXWa5p/aNLgq7LCHCL |
64 |
=19r9 |
65 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
66 |
|
67 |
-- |
68 |
gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list |