Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
To: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Cc: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o>, gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Meeting format
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:01:28
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] Meeting format by Ned Ludd
Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 18:52 -0600, Denis Dupeyron wrote: >> We should also get rid of both the slacker rule and proxies. They're >> good examples of over-engineering. > > This is not within the councils power to get rid of. The users voted for > GLEP-39 which states > our requirements. Should it not be up to them to change it?
So we could just use votify to ask if they are ok to remove them or not.
> Re: Best times for meetings.. > Ok so I generally am employed from the hours of 9-5 M-F PST (GMT-7). The > company I work for can have official meetings any day of the week any > hour of the day with not much more than an hours notice. I've been in > the meeting/council channel for over 5 years now. So I clearly have an > interest in what we are doing as a meta distribution, but If I'm unable > to make a meeting and it's scheduled in the time-frame of my work hours > then I can guaranty nothing. It's more likely that I'd have to be in/out > for the duration of the meeting. If proxy is required then I'd call for > a semi perm proxy of the next in line on the vote rankings. At least > till it causes a personal conflict of interest.
> We can vote on the +m/+v thing if you want to make it official. But it > seems we had a general consensus from everybody that this is what would > be best.
Well, to make it simpler we could just reply in this thread, I'm in favor. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo Council Member Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC