1 |
On 15:19 Thu 20 Nov , Torsten Veller wrote: |
2 |
> * Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>: |
3 |
> > On 13:04 Sun 16 Nov , Torsten Veller wrote: |
4 |
> > > | * Whenever a member of the Council loses their position (the reason is |
5 |
> > > | irrelevant; they could be booted for slacking or they resign or ...), then |
6 |
> > > | the next person in line from the previous Council election is offered the |
7 |
> > > | position. If they decline, it is offered to the next person in line, and so |
8 |
> > > | forth. If they accept and the current Council unanimously accepts the new |
9 |
> > > | person, they get the position with a 'reduced' term such that the yearly |
10 |
> > > | elections still elect a full group. If the Council does not accept that |
11 |
> > > | person, then a new election is held to choose a new member. |
12 |
> > > <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20070208-summary.txt> |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > > So your options are: |
15 |
> > > - Change the rules once again. Because you can. |
16 |
> > > - Follow the rules. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > Try thinking about this from a different perspective: What is best for |
19 |
> > Gentoo? If the rules are broken, they should get fixed instead of |
20 |
> > blindly followed. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> That looks like a topic for today's council meeting, doesn't it? |
23 |
|
24 |
It sure does. Thanks for making that explicitly clear, Torsten! |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Thanks, |
28 |
Donnie |
29 |
|
30 |
Donnie Berkholz |
31 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
32 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |