[gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12

[Ulrich Mueller]

>>>>> On Fri, 09 Oct 2009, Petteri Räty wrote:

> 3. Preservation of file modification times
>    - ulm asked us to vote on it if EAPI 3 is not close to release
>    - from the agenda thread there doesn't seem to be a consensus
>      among PM developers on how to best approach this

Actually, my request was more explicit:

If the council accepts mtime preservation, decide which option it
should be, as outlined in bug 264130 comment 26 [1]:

  A: current Portage and Pkgcore behaviour, all mtimes are preserved
  B: optional update of "old" mtimes
  C: mandatory update

Could you add this to the agenda please?

Ulrich

[1] <http://bugs.gentoo.org/264130#c26>