| 1 |
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:33:44 -0800 |
| 2 |
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Does returning to 4-hour meetings mean things will no longer keep on |
| 4 |
> > getting postponed for 'further discussion' that will never happen |
| 5 |
> > because the meeting ran one second over its allocated time? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> If they never happen, apparently the people desiring discussion don't |
| 8 |
> care enough to continue bringing it up on the list ... |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
So you suggest that when the Council postpones something for further |
| 11 |
discussion, the Council does in fact not desire further discussion? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives