1 |
On 2010.03.01 15:37, Tobias Scherbaum wrote: |
2 |
> Heya, |
3 |
> |
4 |
[snip] |
5 |
|
6 |
> > If so how? Should that be done before or allowed to be done |
7 |
> > after the meeting? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> It should be up to the council member in question - if one feels he's |
10 |
> able to vote before the meeting i see no problem with doing so. I've |
11 |
> some ambivalent feelings about votes after a meeting though ... |
12 |
> |
13 |
[snip] |
14 |
> |
15 |
> - Tobias |
16 |
> |
17 |
> -- |
18 |
> Praxisbuch Nagios |
19 |
> http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/pbnagiosger/ |
20 |
> |
21 |
> https://www.xing.com/profile/Tobias_Scherbaum |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
Voting before the meeting suggests that the council members mind is |
25 |
closed to any discussion that happened, or may happen at the meeting |
26 |
itself. Personally, I don't like the sound of that. |
27 |
|
28 |
However, if the council members wish to vote entirely by email |
29 |
and announce the vote result (no discussion) at the meeting that's |
30 |
fine, as the vote happened after discussion was done. |
31 |
|
32 |
In summary, votes must only be cast after discussion is done. |
33 |
That can be all by email, some at a meeting, others by email after the |
34 |
meeting. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Regards, |
38 |
|
39 |
Roy Bamford |
40 |
(Neddyseagoon) an member of |
41 |
gentoo-ops |
42 |
forum-mods |
43 |
trustees |