Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:50:16
Message-Id: 4C435B2F.4020806@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC by Mike Frysinger
1 On 07/18/2010 10:37 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Sunday, July 18, 2010 11:20:57 Petteri Räty wrote:
3 >> On 07/18/2010 07:42 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
4 >>> On Saturday, July 17, 2010 23:47:39 Alex Alexander wrote:
5 >>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:13:22AM +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. wrote:
6 >>>>> I cross-posted this email to both gentoo-dev and gentoo-council mls as
7 >>>>> Brian used the former and Alex started this thread in the latter. Which
8 >>>>> ML do we want to use?
9 >>>>
10 >>>> IMO we should be using gentoo-council@lists.g.o for this.
11 >>>> Afterall, we are talking about the Council meeting agenda.
12 >>>>
13 >>>> Any topic that needs further discussion before a meeting should be moved
14 >>>> to its own -dev thread anyway.
15 >>>
16 >>> reality is that this probably wont work in practice. cc-ing both lists
17 >>> isnt a problem and lets devs know that the council is indeed doing work.
18 >>
19 >> Cross posting is annoying if you are on both lists and can lead to the
20 >> fragmentation of the thread.
21 >
22 > get a real mail client then. any modern one worth using handles duplicate
23 > mail ids just fine.
24 > -mike
25
26 Yes the first can be worked around (although archives still have
27 multiple copies). The second is a worse problem in my opinion. The
28 current rules are not to cross post. If you are not happy with them you
29 should start a thread on changing them.
30
31 Regards,
32 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies