Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:50:16
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC by Mike Frysinger
On 07/18/2010 10:37 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday, July 18, 2010 11:20:57 Petteri Räty wrote: >> On 07/18/2010 07:42 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Saturday, July 17, 2010 23:47:39 Alex Alexander wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:13:22AM +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. wrote: >>>>> I cross-posted this email to both gentoo-dev and gentoo-council mls as >>>>> Brian used the former and Alex started this thread in the latter. Which >>>>> ML do we want to use? >>>> >>>> IMO we should be using gentoo-council@lists.g.o for this. >>>> Afterall, we are talking about the Council meeting agenda. >>>> >>>> Any topic that needs further discussion before a meeting should be moved >>>> to its own -dev thread anyway. >>> >>> reality is that this probably wont work in practice. cc-ing both lists >>> isnt a problem and lets devs know that the council is indeed doing work. >> >> Cross posting is annoying if you are on both lists and can lead to the >> fragmentation of the thread. > > get a real mail client then. any modern one worth using handles duplicate > mail ids just fine. > -mike
Yes the first can be worked around (although archives still have multiple copies). The second is a worse problem in my opinion. The current rules are not to cross post. If you are not happy with them you should start a thread on changing them. Regards, Petteri


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature