1 |
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 04:05:07AM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> By making initial actions temporary (e.g., 6-12 hours in most cases), |
3 |
> they can be taken rapidly with little negative consequence in the case |
4 |
> of a mistake. The goal is to provide developers with a cooling-off |
5 |
> period but allow them to rejoin the discussion with little loss. |
6 |
|
7 |
++ |
8 |
|
9 |
> All this team's actions must be approved by the lead within a short time |
10 |
> period or must be reverted. It's expected that many actions will range |
11 |
> from 6-12 hours, so 12 hours seems like a reasonable time to require |
12 |
> lead approval. Whenever the lead is unavailable, approval falls to the |
13 |
> council. (Remember, two council members together can make decisions.) |
14 |
|
15 |
I like the spirit, but I'm not sure how feasible this is in practice. |
16 |
In any case, they should be documented (e.g. sent to some private list |
17 |
where the lead and council can see it). |
18 |
|
19 |
cheers, |
20 |
Wernfried |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org |
24 |
Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org |
25 |
forum-mods (at) gentoo.org |
26 |
#gentoo-forums (freenode) |