Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o>, Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o>, gentoo-council <gentoo-council@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:59:31
On Friday 25 December 2009 09:00:36 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> On 12/25/2009 06:10 AM, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o> wrote: > >> I will make it short, since i already requested it 3 times, did create a > >> thread at gentoo-dev ML: > >> > >> agenda topic: Discussion and approval for following item: > >> > >> Adding real multilib features from current multilib-portage to currently > >> hardmasked and testing portage-2.2* for wider testing, more eyes looking > >> at it and hopefully more people helping improving it, so we can get a > >> version, which most can accept for PMS and maybe next EAPI. > > > > Sorry, I forgot to send an email explaining what happened on the > > council alias as promised. The consensus was that the project wasn't > > mature enough to go ahead. Also more generally the council's job isn't > > discussing but deciding, approving, etc... Discussing is what should > > happen on mailing lists. > > Since i see noone arguing against adding the multilib features to current > testing branch of portage, the discussion part already seems to be done. > so a simple approval is ok, drop the discussion request.
that's incorrect. you still havent addressed my outstanding issues. until you do, i dont see how you can push for this being added to portage. or i missed some update along the way, but the last e-mail i see is from me dated 26.10.2009 ... -mike


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature