1 |
Attendance |
2 |
========== |
3 |
Present: |
4 |
Betelgeuse |
5 |
Calchan |
6 |
leio |
7 |
scarabeus |
8 |
solar |
9 |
ulm |
10 |
Missing: |
11 |
dertobi123 |
12 |
|
13 |
Agenda |
14 |
====== |
15 |
Vote on GLEPs 58 to 61 |
16 |
Open discussion on VDB |
17 |
|
18 |
GLEPs 58 to 61 |
19 |
============== |
20 |
GLEPs 58, 59 and 60 were approved unanimously by all present members. GLEP 61 |
21 |
was approved with four votes for it, one against and one abstention. |
22 |
|
23 |
VDB discussion |
24 |
============== |
25 |
The council believes that specifying a unified VDB cache could prevent package |
26 |
managers from innovating. The council also considers that the use of e.g. a |
27 |
timestamp to facilitate working (or experimenting) with different VDB caches |
28 |
is a nice thing, but prefers leaving the decision whether to implement such a |
29 |
feature to the developers of the package managers. |