| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 17:05 Sat 15 Nov , Markus Ullmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Nevertheless to allow council to do good work, I'm stepping back as part |
| 4 |
> > of the council. I'm feeling sorry that this step is needed, really. So |
| 5 |
> > keep up the good work... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Since Cardoe was the last person from the council vote with a |
| 8 |
> distribution that's anywhere between "more positive than negative" and |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
If we use this as a criteria for example amne wouldn't have been a |
| 11 |
member of the 2007 council - also it would be discuss-worthy if Cardoe |
| 12 |
and myself are eligible members for the 2008 council using that |
| 13 |
criteria ... I think that criteria simply doesn't work. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> "even", I suggest that we leave the remaining spot open rather than |
| 16 |
> filling it with someone who the majority of developers ranked in the |
| 17 |
> bottom half of candidates. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
In any case leaving the spot open is not an option for me either, if we |
| 20 |
have 3 votes for $something and 3 votes against $something - what to do |
| 21 |
then? It makes much sense to have an odd number of council members. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I therefore suggest to follow the process being used in the past - |
| 24 |
taking a look at the next one in the election ranking and if a majority |
| 25 |
of council member think this one doesn't fit into the current council |
| 26 |
get developers to vote on a replacement for Jokey. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Tobias |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Gentoo Linux - Die Metadistribution |
| 32 |
http://www.mitp.de/5941 |
| 33 |
http://www.metadistribution.eu |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
https://www.xing.com/profile/Tobias_Scherbaum |
Archives