Archives
Archives
| From: | Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-council@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54: _live or _scm? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:39:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1244140706.6249.0.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54: _live or _scm? by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 | > I prefer "_live" for various reasons: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > - Almost everybody calls them "live ebuilds" not "scm ebuilds" |
| 5 | > - There may be live ebuilds not related to source code management |
| 6 | > (app-portage/eclass-manpages might be an example), and ebuilds |
| 7 | > fetching their sources from a fixed tag in an SCM system, therefore |
| 8 | > not being live. |
| 9 | > - No confusion with the Scheme language. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | +1 on that. live ist the more obvious solution. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Tobias |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |