Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: "Petteri R├Ąty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Council Agenda proposal for upcoming 2010-07-26 meeting
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:56:27
Message-Id: 4C4D93FF.8080903@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-council] Council Agenda proposal for upcoming 2010-07-26 meeting by Alex Alexander
On 25.7.2010 2.55, Alex Alexander wrote:
> Hi, > > following is the Council Agenda proposal for the upcoming meeting on > Monday, July 26th. > > * allow all members to show up (5 min) > ** vote ** > add --as-needed to default profile's LDFLAGS > ** discuss / vote ** > - required-use: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/required-use.html > - review eclass removal policy > should it be 2 years since portage 2.1.4.4 went stable? > - should there a policy about eclass API changes?
> - use of invalid DEPEND atom "EAPI_TOO_OLD" instead of calling die in > global scope on eclasses > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_dee3aab5e8c840ed3fa4add9c7d74b97.xml > and replies > - mailing lists > should we post council agenda to -council? -dev? -project?
We should handle punting -council first. If it survives then -council is the logical choice.
> some devs suggest we should cross-post to -dev and -council > but not everyone likes cross-posting as it can lead to fragmentation
The outcome of the cross-posting thread on gentoo-project is that cross posting is only allowed when using gentoo-dev-announce. Regards, Petteri