1 |
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:45:48 -0500 |
2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > And the resolution for that was to make it possible to disable |
4 |
> > kdebuild-1. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> you were told multiple times that it doesnt belong in the master |
7 |
> branch and that it should be deleted. if you actually wanted to |
8 |
> retain it, you could easily create a kdebuild-1 branch. |
9 |
|
10 |
Uh. No. As per the Council's request, we turned off kdebuild-1 for the |
11 |
approved generated versions of the spec, and we made it possible to show |
12 |
kdebuild-1-specific things in a different colour. |
13 |
|
14 |
22:22 < dberkholz@> ciaranm: you've got your answer. gotta keep the |
15 |
conditionals, it seems |
16 |
|
17 |
> > That is not the same as deleting it while there are still |
18 |
> > users who have kdebuild-1 packages installed. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> the only people who have such packages installed were using an |
21 |
> unapproved spec with unofficial package managers. as such, it is |
22 |
> their problem to continue to support the crap and this argument is |
23 |
> bunk. |
24 |
|
25 |
So you're telling users who did what the Gentoo KDE project told them |
26 |
to do that you don't care about them enough to handle the removal in a |
27 |
carefully controlled manner? |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Ciaran McCreesh |