Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
To: gentoo-council <gentoo-council@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] The slacker mark
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:27:06
Message-Id: 48DD7DD3.1010900@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] The slacker mark by Ned Ludd
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hi.
5
6 Ned Ludd wrote:
7 > On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 15:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
8 >> On Friday 26 September 2008, Torsten Veller wrote:
9 >>> We should clearify the "new election" part in time. I think this council
10 >>> started in July 2008 and there will be many meetings that can be missed
11 >>> in the next 9 month.
12 >>>
13 >>> As there is already a replacement strategy for devs leaving the council
14 >>> (take the next ranked candidate if the council agrees, else elect one)
15 >>> one might think to use the same for a slacker missing any further
16 >>> meeting. But that doesn't work as the slacker can be elected again:
17 >> just make the replacement strategies the same. replacement for a booted
18 >> slacker is the same for someone who resigns council/Gentoo or is kicked out.
19 >> elections take time and are a hassle. selecting from the original list is a
20 >> lot simpler.
21 >> -mike
22 >
23 >
24 > I strongly disagree with this method. People opt to not run for the
25 > council when they see what they expect to be a strong council. So if you
26 > see you have 8 pretty strong devs and 6 weak ones running. That's good
27 > enough sign to make you decline any nominations. As the people get sick
28 > etc this defaulting to the next inline can lead to results of the
29 > council which could completely and radically destroy Gentoo.
30
31 Ned,
32
33 I understand your point, but the rule is that the remaining council
34 members can opt to select the next in line or to open an election for
35 the vacant spot. So going down the line isn't automatic.
36 Perhaps we should also add a rule that if 50% (other percentage?) of the
37 original council is replaced, we need to have a new election.
38
39
40 - --
41 Regards,
42
43 Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
44 Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / SPARC / KDE
45 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
46 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
47 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
48
49 iEYEARECAAYFAkjdfdMACgkQcAWygvVEyAI7pgCgimAhLkl9Rup5QIHrCuYUuL8T
50 85QAnjpyi7QAF3Q2rVm1Q5VRIcDEClBw
51 =sRPf
52 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----