| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:40:43 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Count me in as well for that idea. Having that "nobody" person running |
| 5 |
> > in the election allows us to have a clear and comprehensible breakup |
| 6 |
> > between those candidates who could easily fill a gap and those who |
| 7 |
> > don't (and therefore when it's time to hold an election for a person |
| 8 |
> > filling that gap). It still leaves one question open: What to do when |
| 9 |
> > "nobody" is elected on the 5th or 6th position (or even the 1st ...)? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The Debian nobody is called "reopen nominations". |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Well, they elect 1 person, we elect 7 - with a nobody called "reopen |
| 14 |
nominations" it's compared to Debian more likely that we would run into |
| 15 |
a neverending election process ... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Tobias |
Archives