Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Chrissy Fullam <musikc@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-council] RE: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 11 October 2007
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:25:13
Message-Id: 09EA41D0A8D249D8A3D6708C15ABD237@draco2
In Reply to: [gentoo-council] Council meeting summary for 11 October 2007 by Donnie Berkholz
> Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Here is the summary from today's council meeting. The > complete log will show up at
<snip> - The CoC is in effect, but it needs a new enforcement section since the proctors were disbanded. The council is sending discussion of this to the gentoo-project list, to come up with proposals for three points: - who enforces it - musikc said devrel could - tsunam said userrel could <snip> I wanted to clarify, please understand the intent behind my part of the conversation was that devrel and userrel should continue to share the responsibility as appropriate, and continue to work together, including the questionable/overlapping areas. The above may have been misinterpreted by some to indicate 'pick which one', when my intent was a joined front on enforcing the CoC. Kind regards, Christina Fullam Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | Gentoo Public Relations -- gentoo-council@g.o mailing list