1 |
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:42:18AM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> On 16:42 Thu 08 Nov , Wernfried Haas wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 04:05:07AM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
4 |
> > > All this team's actions must be approved by the lead within a short time |
5 |
> > > period or must be reverted. It's expected that many actions will range |
6 |
> > > from 6-12 hours, so 12 hours seems like a reasonable time to require |
7 |
> > > lead approval. Whenever the lead is unavailable, approval falls to the |
8 |
> > > council. (Remember, two council members together can make decisions.) |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > I like the spirit, but I'm not sure how feasible this is in practice. |
11 |
> > In any case, they should be documented (e.g. sent to some private list |
12 |
> > where the lead and council can see it). |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I agree that it would be infeasible if this were a regular occurrence. |
15 |
> My and Ferris's expectations were that it would be fairly rare, but we |
16 |
> don't have much real-world data to bear that out. Could you share some |
17 |
> from your experience with the original proctors? |
18 |
|
19 |
I think things have cooled down since that time, but during the weeks |
20 |
the proctors actually were in effect some people were warned to behave |
21 |
nicely (btw, this is something that i think should also be done in the |
22 |
new approach before doing nastier stuff). |
23 |
|
24 |
I'm not sure if they would have been approved within the 12 hour |
25 |
timeframe. Even if it (hopefully) doesn't happen often, i guess |
26 |
depending on who the lead is and how regulary he/she checks in, the |
27 |
time limit may pass. Hence i suggested doing something else |
28 |
(e.g. sending it to a list for peer review (e.g. other members of the |
29 |
team and council)). |
30 |
|
31 |
This is quite similar to how warnings andbans are done on the forums, |
32 |
we always document who warned/banned whom and for what reason and it |
33 |
has worked quite well so far there. |
34 |
|
35 |
HTH & cheers, |
36 |
Wernfried |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org |
40 |
Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org |
41 |
forum-mods (at) gentoo.org |
42 |
#gentoo-forums (freenode) |