Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Torsten Veller <tove@g.o>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Cc: Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-council] Re: Nominations open for 1 council slot
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:14:16
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] Nominations open for 1 council slot by Mart Raudsepp
* Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o>:
> On R, 2008-11-28 at 18:55 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > I would like to nominate Mart Raudsepp (leio@g.o). > > After investigating on the reasons of why this is an election instead of > picking the next in line, I found out that is so because the correction > to GLEP39 decided says that to be the procedure: > > The acceptance didn't seem to be unanimous due to some council members > preferring an election to be hold for the spot, therefore an election is > held. > > In that spirit, as the second in line based on the full election in > summer, I accept the nomination with the same platform[1] except for the > last three lines talking about GUADEC, as they are obviously out of date > now.
You will soon find this in the meeting logs: 20:25 <@dberkholz> i'm not opposed to dev-zero per se, but i think we've already gone too far down the list. as i mentioned on the -council mailing list, more people would have nominated themselves had they thought that not enough good potential members were already there. [...] 20:30 <@dertobi123> dberkholz: *shrugs* ... we're still in the upper half of the list, compared with the 2007 list i don't get where we're going to go too far down. [...] 20:32 <@dberkholz> dertobi123: you can also consider this a test of the voting system to actually get things done fast enough so it doesn't delay council activity at all. [...] 20:33 <@dertobi123> dberkholz: i could, but i don't see why we shouldn't follow the steps which worked in the past few years [...] 20:34 <@dberkholz> dertobi123: because 5 of the council members would rather do something else. =)