1 |
Find below a proposed agenda for our next meeting. |
2 |
|
3 |
I'll post it to gentoo-council and gentoo-dev-announce this Friday, |
4 |
unless there are objections. |
5 |
|
6 |
Ulrich |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
1. Intro (10 minutes, including late arrivals) |
10 |
1.1. Make sure that at least a couple people are logging the meeting. |
11 |
1.2. Roll call. |
12 |
1.3. Any volunteers to chair this meeting? |
13 |
|
14 |
2. Approve summary of October meeting (5 minutes) |
15 |
(in case it will be ready then) |
16 |
|
17 |
3. Follow-ups from previous meeting (15 minutes) |
18 |
3.1. EAPI 3 status (zmedico, ulm) |
19 |
3.2. Upgrade path for old systems (leio, solar) |
20 |
Should important system packages (e.g. Python) be reverted to |
21 |
EAPI 0, in order to provide a defined upgrade path? |
22 |
|
23 |
4. Prefix support in main Portage tree (grobian) (20 minutes) |
24 |
Fabian Groffen proposes that package managers should define the |
25 |
EPREFIX, EROOT, and ED variables (see [1] and replies). |
26 |
4.1. Does the council generally support this idea? |
27 |
4.2. Can it still be included in EAPI 3, or even in a fast EAPI 2.1? |
28 |
|
29 |
5. AOB / open floor (10 minutes) |
30 |
|
31 |
[1] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_2a62689c71f95e4de5699a330b8b5524.xml |