| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:20:25 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>>> [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.0_pre20090310 [from svn master |
| 5 |
>>>> r12345] |
| 6 |
>>> That claim right there is enough to show that you haven't thought |
| 7 |
>>> about this at all. Your proposal is lots of handwaving magic, most |
| 8 |
>>> of it unimplementable. I suggest you put together a reference |
| 9 |
>>> implementation before promoting this idea any further. |
| 10 |
>> What's wrong is U that should be R beside that there isn't much |
| 11 |
>> magic... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The U isn't the problem. The svn revision is the problem. You need to |
| 14 |
> consider how the package manager would get the revision. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I know, if you are re emerging you have those information, if you are |
| 18 |
updating you won't have them. That's why either the U or the revision |
| 19 |
information is wrong. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
lu |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Luca Barbato |
| 26 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 27 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 28 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
Archives