Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o>
Cc: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>, gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] mtime preservation
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:01:47
Message-Id: 20091120001820.7274bdf7@snowmobile
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] mtime preservation by Denis Dupeyron
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:14:20 -0700
Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Ciaran McCreesh > <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: > > I honestly don't think we should be going anywhere with this until > > Portage is using a mechanism that guarantees correct sub-second > > resolution preservation in all cases. > > Any idea, or even the beginning of one, of how to make that happen?
My understanding is that someone with Python knowledge would have to write an external C library that provides a replacement for stat and a wrapper for either utimensat or futimens. -- Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-council] mtime preservation Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>