1 |
On Sunday 13 December 2009 14:30:44 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:45:48 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > > And the resolution for that was to make it possible to disable |
4 |
> > > kdebuild-1. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > you were told multiple times that it doesnt belong in the master |
7 |
> > branch and that it should be deleted. if you actually wanted to |
8 |
> > retain it, you could easily create a kdebuild-1 branch. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Uh. No. As per the Council's request, we turned off kdebuild-1 for the |
11 |
> approved generated versions of the spec, and we made it possible to show |
12 |
> kdebuild-1-specific things in a different colour. |
13 |
|
14 |
i'm talking about when this crap was added originally, not any recent |
15 |
conversations |
16 |
|
17 |
> > > That is not the same as deleting it while there are still |
18 |
> > > users who have kdebuild-1 packages installed. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > the only people who have such packages installed were using an |
21 |
> > unapproved spec with unofficial package managers. as such, it is |
22 |
> > their problem to continue to support the crap and this argument is |
23 |
> > bunk. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> So you're telling users who did what the Gentoo KDE project told them |
26 |
> to do that you don't care about them enough to handle the removal in a |
27 |
> carefully controlled manner? |
28 |
|
29 |
no one here said you had to change your PM. i could care less about your PM. |
30 |
feel free to keep that crap in your PM forever ... it is after all your own |
31 |
fault. nothing you said here is relevant to PMS in any way. |
32 |
|
33 |
it's actually kind of sad how you can sit there and block any PMS additions |
34 |
that have been used in the tree for years because you didnt feel like |
35 |
implementing it in your PM, yet crap that was explicitly never official or in |
36 |
used in the tree you feel you have a right to keep in the PMS. it doesnt |
37 |
belong there, it never has, so delete it/branch it already. |
38 |
-mike |