| 1 |
On Sunday, July 18, 2010 15:51:11 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/18/2010 10:37 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sunday, July 18, 2010 11:20:57 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On 07/18/2010 07:42 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> On Saturday, July 17, 2010 23:47:39 Alex Alexander wrote: |
| 6 |
> >>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:13:22AM +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. wrote: |
| 7 |
> >>>>> I cross-posted this email to both gentoo-dev and gentoo-council mls |
| 8 |
> >>>>> as Brian used the former and Alex started this thread in the latter. |
| 9 |
> >>>>> Which ML do we want to use? |
| 10 |
> >>>> |
| 11 |
> >>>> IMO we should be using gentoo-council@lists.g.o for this. |
| 12 |
> >>>> Afterall, we are talking about the Council meeting agenda. |
| 13 |
> >>>> |
| 14 |
> >>>> Any topic that needs further discussion before a meeting should be |
| 15 |
> >>>> moved to its own -dev thread anyway. |
| 16 |
> >>> |
| 17 |
> >>> reality is that this probably wont work in practice. cc-ing both lists |
| 18 |
> >>> isnt a problem and lets devs know that the council is indeed doing |
| 19 |
> >>> work. |
| 20 |
> >> |
| 21 |
> >> Cross posting is annoying if you are on both lists and can lead to the |
| 22 |
> >> fragmentation of the thread. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > get a real mail client then. any modern one worth using handles |
| 25 |
> > duplicate mail ids just fine. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Yes the first can be worked around (although archives still have |
| 28 |
> multiple copies). The second is a worse problem in my opinion. The |
| 29 |
> current rules are not to cross post. If you are not happy with them you |
| 30 |
> should start a thread on changing them. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
there was a debate on the issue, but there was never a clear edict on it. so |
| 33 |
dont quote the situation as if there was. |
| 34 |
-mike |
Archives