From: | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-council@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12 | ||
Date: | Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:32:27 | ||
Message-Id: | 1255123944.1724.1.camel@hangover | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12 by Roy Bamford |
1 | On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 21:56 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: |
2 | > On 2009.10.09 21:13, Petteri Räty wrote: |
3 | > > 1. Discuss why follow up for items from last meeting never happened. |
4 | > > Should we do something to ensure this doesn't happen again? |
5 | > [snip] |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | > Team, |
9 | > |
10 | > Yes, it needs to be fixed. |
11 | |
12 | Fixed? |
13 | Actually it seems the council is split on if PMS was even worth keeping |
14 | around. |
15 | |
16 | |
17 | -- |
18 | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
19 | Gentoo Linux |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12 | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12 | Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> |