Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
To: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Secretary & President
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 01:05:01
Message-Id: 20090207010453.GE3493@comet
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] Secretary & President by Ciaran McCreesh
On 22:37 Fri 06 Feb     , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:33:44 -0800 > Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: > > > Does returning to 4-hour meetings mean things will no longer keep on > > > getting postponed for 'further discussion' that will never happen > > > because the meeting ran one second over its allocated time? > > > > If they never happen, apparently the people desiring discussion don't > > care enough to continue bringing it up on the list ... > > So you suggest that when the Council postpones something for further > discussion, the Council does in fact not desire further discussion?
I am trying to say that in the generic sense, people who want something to happen need to drive that change. Perhaps it needs to be made clear when further discussion should be initiated by the people who want the discussion to happen. -- Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: