Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-council@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12 | ||
| Date: | Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:29:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | 19152.53882.243649.730194@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12 by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Different Portage versions do different things with mtimes, |
| 4 | |
| 5 | From bug 181021 I conclude that Portage preserves timestamps since |
| 6 | version 2.1.2.10, and 2.1.2.11 went stable in August 2007. That's more |
| 7 | than two years ago. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > so currently ebuilds can't rely upon any particular behaviour. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Show me _one_ user who is still using an older Portage version |
| 12 | (together with a current tree). ;-) |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12 | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |