| 1 |
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Ned Ludd<solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:24 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > What I propose: |
| 5 |
>> > 1. Use gentoo-dev for technical council related matters |
| 6 |
>> > 2. Use gentoo-project for non technical council related matters |
| 7 |
>> > 3. Use gentoo-dev-announce to start threads if deemed necessary but |
| 8 |
>> > moderators should be alert in order to not have too much of these |
| 9 |
>> > through -dev-announce. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> I'd keep the council ml, I agree that there is some overlap, but |
| 12 |
>> -project and -dev have a broader scope and much higher noise/signal ratio. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I tend to agree with this also. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> The -council mailing list is one I'd like to see used for it's official |
| 17 |
> matters. If not simply for logs and historical tracking. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Although I think the gentoo-council mailing list makes sense, I don't |
| 20 |
really mind where we post our ideas and discuss them. As long as we |
| 21 |
agree and do discuss them. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
What I care a lot about is that we only have one list. Not everything |
| 24 |
will be purely technical or non-technical. Where do we draw the line? |
| 25 |
In case of ambiguous topic most will just post at random, others will |
| 26 |
tend to always post on the same list, and in the end we'll have to |
| 27 |
read 2 lists to make sure we catch all what would have interested us |
| 28 |
on only one of them. Not counting those who really don't care about |
| 29 |
the council and will complain about our gibberish. So why bother? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
So, whichever list it is I don't mind, but please make a decision |
| 32 |
because I have stuff to push there. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Denis. |
Archives