Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
To: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:20:32
Message-Id: 49B7D6B9.2040606@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal by Ciaran McCreesh
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:55:52 +0100 > Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: >> The ebuild itself has some embedded information so portage >> could/should provide something like. >> >> [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.0_pre20090310 [from svn master >> r12345] > > That claim right there is enough to show that you haven't thought about > this at all. Your proposal is lots of handwaving magic, most of it > unimplementable. I suggest you put together a reference implementation > before promoting this idea any further.
What's wrong is U that should be R beside that there isn't much magic... lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo Council Member Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>