| 1 |
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 03:48:51PM -0400, Thomas Anderson wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 09:43:25PM +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hi, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Petteri R??ty <betelgeuse@g.o>: |
| 6 |
> > > I see a couple course of possible actions: |
| 7 |
> > > 1. Current PMS already implies this behavior and Portage is buggy. |
| 8 |
> > > Let's document this explicitly for EAPI 3 and have Portage fixed so |
| 9 |
> > > using EAPI 3 makes sure this syntax works. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Looks like the best practise to me. It is a corner case, but better |
| 12 |
> > be safe. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > V-Li |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > -- |
| 17 |
> > Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
| 18 |
> > <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > <URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> ++, this is what seems best to me as well. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> -- |
| 26 |
> --------- |
| 27 |
> Thomas Anderson |
| 28 |
> Gentoo Developer |
| 29 |
> ///////// |
| 30 |
> Areas of responsibility: |
| 31 |
> AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council |
| 32 |
> --------- |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Ignore this, I fail at realizing what ml I'm replying to. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
--------- |
| 40 |
Thomas Anderson |
| 41 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 42 |
///////// |
| 43 |
Areas of responsibility: |
| 44 |
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council |
| 45 |
--------- |
Archives