| 1 |
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> i still dont see what is wrong with the amendment process that has been used |
| 3 |
> multiple times in the past |
| 4 |
[...] |
| 5 |
> council members are *voted in* because the community *trusts them to make the |
| 6 |
> important decisions*. if the decision made really pisses off the community, |
| 7 |
> again you will hear about it and you can take the response into consideration. |
| 8 |
> plus, if you do something really stupid, it isnt like your ass will remain in |
| 9 |
> power. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I totally agree with you. However a majority of council members and |
| 12 |
many devs seem to think that since GLEP 39 was originally voted by all |
| 13 |
devs then every amendment to it needs to also be voted by all devs. As |
| 14 |
I saw that coming I asked the council to vote on whether it could |
| 15 |
decide on a process and the outcome was no. The only sensible way to |
| 16 |
go forward now is thus to ask developers what they want us to do. The |
| 17 |
other alternatives are not amending GLEP 39 or asking all devs to vote |
| 18 |
on each amendments. The former is obviously silly and I'm convinced |
| 19 |
the latter, although logical, isn't a good practical solution and may |
| 20 |
not be what a majority of devs want. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Denis. |
Archives