From: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-council@l.g.o, zmedico@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54/55 updates [WAS] Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009 | ||
Date: | Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:12:15 | ||
Message-Id: | 49B3A85B.4050307@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54/55 updates [WAS] Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009 by Donnie Berkholz |
1 | Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 | > |
3 | > Furthermore, why do I need to prod people for an update? When you commit |
4 | > to a date, you should be minimally sending out *something* on that date |
5 | > to let us know what is blocking progress. I don't enjoy acting like a |
6 | > mother hen, and I can't imagine it's terribly fun from the other end |
7 | > either. |
8 | > |
9 | |
10 | Zac promised me he would implemented the code into Portage but he hasn't |
11 | done it yet as far as I know. |
12 | |
13 | Regards, |
14 | Petteri |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54/55 updates [WAS] Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009 | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |