1 |
Irc log is available on |
2 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~blubber/desktop-research/meeting_20030119.log |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
> On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 09:54, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > The report of yesterday's desktop-research meeting can be found at: |
8 |
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/research/meeting_reports.xml#doc_chap2 |
9 |
> |
10 |
> It lacks any rationale or even if what i proposed got discussed, which i |
11 |
> think is of more immediate importance than any of both currently started |
12 |
> subprojects. An IRC log would be helpful or even better a short summary. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> In the subprojects themselves i lack both rationale and any serious |
15 |
> details of how this is going to be planned. To be honest the 'graphical |
16 |
> installer' is proposed and started seven times seven times by now |
17 |
> without any significant results. And i doubt it falls under the category |
18 |
> 'desktop project', it's much broader and has actually little to do with |
19 |
> working on a desktop. On a minor note, the lead is not even member of |
20 |
> the research project (or not so on the project page) and that seems like |
21 |
> a logical requirement to me. Is it even a good idea to have a DTL lead |
22 |
> also lead a research project? DTL leads should be validating their |
23 |
> personally lead projects in the end, that's not a good thing per se. |
24 |
> Just member would probably be better. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Now let's get back to my hack 'n slash game ;) |
27 |
> |
28 |
> - foser |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
> -- |
32 |
> gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |
33 |
-- |
34 |
Gentoo Linux Documentation developer |
35 |
Dutch Documentation: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/nl/index.xml |
36 |
blubber@g.o | http://dev.gentoo.org/~blubber/ |
37 |
|
38 |
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E9E3A6 |
39 |
Key fingerprint = 6749 CD77 B577 D615 4B3C A082 C430 0ACD E3E9 E3A6 |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |