Gentoo Archives: gentoo-desktop-research

From: foser <foser@g.o>
To: gentoo-desktop-research@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-desktop-research] test
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 13:17:47
Message-Id: 1065705334.3824.11.camel@rivendell
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-desktop-research] test by
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 15:00, dams@×××.fr wrote:
> [ sorry my mails are not yet signed, but will be soon ]
Humm, isn't this a bit weird requirement ? Is this a closed list or not ? I'm not much of a signer.
> I think the above process is not bad at all. So that could be : > > - define the problem > - look if it has not being resolved, or if nobody is working on it, inside gentoo > - look for similar problem inside gentoo > - look for similar problems outside gentoo (official software author, other > distro) > - find a way to solve it, by discussing it here or #irc (taht would be the > Evaluation part of gerrynjr) > - allocate people on it, plan the solving time. > - write proposal/recommendations to gentoo main
Should go trough DTL (whatever it turns out to be) first.
> - fo the main inclusion, I have no precise ideas.
> > - Will we have a seperate cvs testing tree (overlay)? > > I don't know, what do you think?
implementation details.. this is not something that should be solver on a per project basis, but distro wide.
> > - How are we going to make sure that the solutions get out of the testing > > tree, and in to the main distribution? Will we use GLEP's? > > why not, but maybe new ebuilds/doc, with official maintainers could suffice?
No question we should use GLEPs, that's what they are for. - foser -- gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-desktop-research] test Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>