1 |
foser <foser@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 13:23, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
3 |
>> If the rest of the research people also feel that your proposal is |
4 |
>> more important to pursue right now and should be the second project |
5 |
>> instead of the installer, I have no problem with that. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Well, it's not about one or the other, we can have both. The menu thing |
8 |
> has been long going and actually just misses some left-over research and |
9 |
> mostly implementation. But at least it's a goal i think we can achieve |
10 |
> within a reasonable time frame and is an obvious improvement to the |
11 |
> desktop experience as a whole (as opposed to an installer). I see it |
12 |
> didn't even get discussed, which is a bit of a shame. I thought you were |
13 |
> on of the initiators behind the initial unified menu proposal spyderous |
14 |
> ? |
15 |
|
16 |
You've mentioned me being an initiator of that a couple of times, and I |
17 |
think you must be confusing me with someone else. The only point I had IRT |
18 |
the .desktop files was getting upstream to do them instead of us writing |
19 |
hundreds. |
20 |
|
21 |
Donnie |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |