| 1 |
If g-d-r is terminated, what happens to the subprojects (specifically |
| 2 |
the config tools)? Also dead, now that Gnome System Tools supports |
| 3 |
Gentoo? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I kinda wish I'd hung around more on #gentoo-desktop-research and found |
| 6 |
some ways to contribute. Of all the Gentoo projects this was always the |
| 7 |
one that interested me the most as any results would probably have a big |
| 8 |
impact on the day-to-day usability of Gentoo. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I think (Gentoo) desktop usability definitely has a way to go, although |
| 11 |
as Adrian mentioned, I'm not sure where some of the projects belong -- |
| 12 |
as a Gentoo project or as a part of the various desktop environments |
| 13 |
(Gnome / KDE). That seems like a question that would need to be |
| 14 |
addressed. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
To address Paul DV's point: would this project be more likely to succeed |
| 17 |
if different developers that didn't have as many commitments were put to |
| 18 |
work on it? Maybe a new round of recruitment or something similar to |
| 19 |
drum up interest? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
ks |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 18:42 +0200, dams@×××.fr wrote: |
| 27 |
> Yo, |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> I'm going to close gentoo-desktop-research, unless anyone is against it, and |
| 30 |
> wants to take responsability of it, accordingly to the deciding people |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> There has been not enough mails, ideas, productive work, and effective actions, |
| 33 |
> plus a very long inactive time, so I think I take no risk in sayng that this |
| 34 |
> mailing list and the associate project is dead. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> comments? |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |
Archives